October 01, 2015
2 min read
Save

FDA approves Opdivo plus Yervoy for BRAF V600 wild-type melanoma

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The FDA approved the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for treatment of patients with BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma, according to a press release issued by the agents’ manufacturer.

Nivolumab (Opdivo, Bristol-Myers Squibb) and ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb) are immune-checkpoint inhibitors that target separate but complementary checkpoint pathways.

Ipilimumab’s blockade of CTLA-4 augments T-cell activation and proliferation, while nivolumab — a PD-1 inhibitor — helps to restore active T-cell response directed at the tumor.

This is the first time the FDA approved a regimen that includes two immuno-oncology agents for cancer treatment.

Jedd D. Wolchok

“Historically, metastatic melanoma has been a difficult disease to treat. Now, a new treatment option based on the combination of two valued immuno-oncology agents demonstrates significant efficacy … in metastatic melanoma,” Jedd D. Wolchok, MD, PhD, chief of the Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and a HemOnc Today Editorial Board member, said in a press release. “[This] approval represents a step forward for the melanoma community, providing hope for patients with metastatic melanoma.”

The FDA based the approval on results of the CheckMate 069 trial, a randomized, double blind phase 2 study in which researchers randomly assigned 140 treatment-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone.

Objective response rate in patients with BRAF wild-type tumors served as the study’s primary endpoint.

Results showed the combination conferred a statistically significant increase in confirmed objective response rate among patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma (60% vs. 11%; P < .001). Among the 43 patients who responded to the combination regimen, 34 had a response duration of at least 6 months and 20 had a response duration of at least 9 months.

The combination also was associated with a reduced risk for progression (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, P < .002) and longer median PFS (8.9 months vs. 4.7 months) compared with ipilimumab alone.

A higher percentage of patients assigned the combination regimen experienced severe adverse reactions (62% vs. 39%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (43% vs. 11%) or dose delays (47% vs. 22%), and grade 3 or grade 4 adverse reactions (69% vs. 43%).

The most common adverse reactions associated with the combination regimen were rash (67% for combination vs. 57% for ipilimumab alone), pruritus (37% vs. 26%), headache (24% vs. 20%), vomiting (23% vs. 15%) and colitis (22% vs. 11%).

The most frequent serious adverse events associated with the combination regimen were colitis (17% for combination vs. 9% for ipilimumab alone), diarrhea (9% vs. 7%), pyrexia (6% vs. 7%) and pneumonitis (5% vs. 0%).

“We are currently witnessing a turning point in cancer history, based on the significant impact immuno-oncology is making in the lives of patients with metastatic melanoma,” Tim Turnham, executive director of the Melanoma Research Foundation, said in the press release. “[This] approval of the first regimen of two immuno-oncology agents, Opdivo and Yervoy, is an exciting moment for our community because it reinforces we are on a positive path forward, providing new approaches which translate into meaningful results for patients.”