April 06, 2015
3 min read
Save

Sickle cell disease increases mortality risk during pregnancy

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The risk for death during or after pregnancy is six times higher among women with sickle cell disease compared with pregnant women without the disease, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Women with sickle cell disease also were more likely to experience preeclampsia, stillbirth and preterm delivery, results showed.

“While we know that women with sickle cell disease will have high-risk pregnancies, we have lacked the evidence that would allow us to confidently tell these patients how likely they are to experience one complication over the other,” study researcher Eugene Oteng-Ntim, MD, of the Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, said in a press release. “This reality makes it difficult for us as care providers to properly counsel our sickle cell patients considering pregnancy.”

Researchers previously have been unable to define risks associated with pregnancy for women with sickle cell disease due to heterogeneity in the pathophysiology of the disease, according to the study background.

Oteng-Ntim and colleagues examined data from 21 published studies that compared outcomes among pregnant women with (n = 26,349) and without sickle cell disease (n = 26,151,746). Of the women with sickle cell disease, 1,276 had the HbSS genotype and 279 had the HbSC genotype. The other 24,794 women had unreported genotypes.

Researchers observed an increased risk for maternal mortality in women with the HbSS genotype (RR = 5.98; 95% CI, 1.94-18.44) and nonspecified sickle cell disease (RR = 18.51; 95% CI, 8.63-39.72) compared with women without sickle cell disease. Only one death was reported among women with the HbSC genotype.

The risk for preeclampsia doubled in women with the HbSC genotype (RR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.17-3.54) and nonspecified sickle cell disease (RR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.49-2.85) compared with women without sickle cell disease. Women with the HbSS genotype faced increased risks for preeclampsia (RR = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.75-3.39) and eclampsia (RR = 4.89; 95% CI, 1.97-12.16).

The risk for stillbirth increased fourfold among women with the HbSS genotype (RR = 3.94; 95% CI, 2.6-5.96) and nearly twofold among women with the HbSC genotype (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.05-3.02).

Women with the HbSS genotype also faced significantly increased risks for neonatal death (RR = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.82) and preterm delivery (RR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.47-3.31).

The risk for infants born small for gestational age was significantly greater for women with the HbSS genotype (RR = 3.72; 95% CI, 2.32-5.98) and the HbSC genotype (RR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.04-3.77).

Thirteen of the studies were conducted in high-income countries ($30,000 or higher per capita income), whereas the other nine studies were conducted in low- to median-income countries.

The risks for preeclampsia, preterm delivery and small for gestational age infants persisted in women with sickle cell disease regardless of their location. However, women with sickle cell disease who lived in countries with a higher gross national income faced less significant risks for maternal mortality (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86) and stillbirth (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.55).

“Even in developed countries with advanced care, there continues to be a much higher maternal mortality rate in women with sickle cell disease compared to the general population, strongly suggesting that more work must be done to improve outcomes for these patients and their families,” Oteng-Ntim said. “By improving care providers’ ability to more accurately predict adverse outcomes, this analysis is a first step toward improving universal care for all who suffer from this disease.” – by Cameron Kelsall

Disclosure: Oteng-Ntim reports no relevant financial disclosures. One researcher reports advisory roles with AesRx and Novartis.