August 13, 2014
2 min read
Save

Blood, saliva testing may predict recurrence of HPV-related head and neck cancers

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Testing for HPV-16 DNA in saliva and plasma may be a useful predictor of recurrence in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, according to study results.

Perspective from Barbara Burtness, MD

“There is a window of opportunity in the year after initial therapy to take an aggressive approach to spotting recurrences and intensively addressing them while they are still highly treatable,” researcher Joseph Califano, MD, of Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, said in a press release. “Until now, there has been no reliable biological way to identify which patients are at higher risk for recurrence, so these tests should greatly help do so.”

Joseph Califano, MD

Joseph Califano

Califano and colleagues evaluated 93 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of undetermined etiology. All patients underwent surgery, radiation or both.

The researchers used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to test pre- and post-treatment blood and/or saliva samples from all participants.

During median follow-up of 49 months, 19 patients (20%) developed post-treatment recurrence; of them, 14 had HPV-16–positive tumors and five had HPV-16–negative tumors.

The researchers determined the measurement of HPV-16 DNA status through pre-treatment saliva and plasma yielded a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 100%, a negative predictive value of 42%, and positive predictive value of 100%.

The sensitivity of pretreatment saliva testing alone was 52.8% and the sensitivity of pretreatment plasma testing alone was 67.3%.

Results of multivariate analysis showed post-treatment HPV-positive status measured by saliva was significantly associated with increased risk for recurrence (HR=10.7, 95% CI=2.36-48.5). Researchers observed a significant association between shorter OS and patients with post-treatment HPV-positive saliva samples alone (HR=25.9; 95% CI=3.23-208), as well as those with either HPV-positive saliva or plasma (HR=21.2; 95% CI, 1.85-242). However, researchers did not observe a significant association between OS and post-treatment HPV-positive plasma alone (HR=3.33; 95% CI, .03-37).

Overall, the combined post-treatment assessment of HPV-16 DNA status in saliva and plasma demonstrated a 90.7% specificity and 69.5% sensitivity for predicting recurrence within 3 years.

“When combining saliva HPV DNA status with plasma HPV DNA status, patients with HPV-positive status in either source had significantly worse [recurrence-free survival] and OS,” Califano and colleagues wrote. “Thus, quantitative PCR detection of HPV DNA in post-treatment surveillance saliva and plasma samples can function as a valuable prognostic biomarker of RFS and OS in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC.”

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant disclosures.