May 01, 2014
1 min read
Save

Panitumumab noninferior to cetuximab in chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Panitumumab and cetuximab conferred similar OS benefits and demonstrated comparable safety profiles in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer, according to phase 3 study results.

The multicenter, open-label analysis evaluated the two anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in 999 patients with an ECOG performance status of ≤2.

Researchers randomly assigned 499 patients 6 mg/kg panitumumab (Vectibix, Amgen) every 2 weeks. The remaining 500 patients received a 400 mg/m2 loading dose of cetuximab (Erbitux; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly), followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly.

Researchers calculated a –3.19 z score for OS, demonstrating panitumumab’s noninferiority to cetuximab (P=.0007). They also found panitumumab retained 105.7% (95% CI, 81.9-129.5) of cetuximab’s effect on OS demonstrated in the study.

Results indicated median OS of 10.4 months for the panitumumab arm and 10 months for the cetuximab (HR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11).

In general, incidence of adverse events of any grade was comparable between arms. Grade 3 to grade 4 skin toxicity occurred in 13% of patients assigned panitumumab and 10% of those assigned cetuximab. More patients assigned cetuximab experienced grade 3 to grade 4 infusion reaction (2% vs. ˂.5%), whereas grade 3 to grade 4 hypomagnesaemia was more common in the panitumumab arm (7% vs. 3%).

One patient died in the cetuximab arm due to a treatment-related lung infection.

“In view of the consistency in efficacy and toxicity seen, small but meaningful differences in [grade 3 to grade 4] infusion reactions and differences in dose scheduling can guide physician choice of anti-EGFR treatment,” the researchers concluded.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Amgen. See the study for a full list of the researchers’ relevant financial disclosures.