Serum VEGF levels predicted response to ipilimumab in advanced melanoma
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Patients with advanced melanoma who had high serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels at baseline demonstrated inferior response and shorter OS after ipilimumab treatment than patients who had lower levels, according to study results.
“VEGF is known to suppress the maturation of immune cells and their antitumor responses, and evidence points toward an association between high serum VEGF levels and poor prognosis in melanoma patients,” F. Stephen Hodi, MD, director of the Melanoma Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, said in a press release. “VEGF has also been shown to be a potential biomarker for other immunotherapies, thus it seemed logical to test the ability of VEGF to predict responses to ipilimumab.”
F. Stephen Hodi
Hodi and colleagues evaluated blood samples from 176 patients with metastatic melanoma. The median age of patients was 62 years (range, 16-91). Most were male (70%) and had stage IV disease (98.7%).
Overall, serum VEGF levels ranged from 0.1 pg/ml to 894.4 pg/ml in patients before treatment with ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb).
Patients received 3-mg/kg (n=98) or 10-mg/kg (n=68) doses of ipilimumab.
After 24 weeks of treatment, patients with baseline serum VEGF levels below the cutoff — defined as 43 pg/ml — were more likely to achieve a complete or partial response to treatment than patients with baseline serum VEGF levels above the cutoff (41.1% vs. 23.2%; P=.019).
Baseline serum VEGF levels higher than the cutoff also were associated with inferior median OS (6.6 months vs. 12.9 months; P=.006). This association remained significant among patients assigned 3-mg/kg (7.4 months vs. 14.3 months; P=.037) and 10-mg/kg (6.2 months vs. 10.9 months; P=.048) doses.
Researchers determined changes in serum VEGF levels during treatment were not associated with response or OS.
“We found that VEGF may actually hinder some of the effects of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor,” Hodi said. “We are beginning to better define predictive biomarkers for immune-checkpoint blockers, specifically ipilimumab. Our study further suggests that there is a potential interaction existing between the biology of angiogenesis and immune-checkpoint blockade. It may be worthwhile to investigate combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced melanoma with high serum VEGF levels.”
Disclosure: The researchers report commercial research support from and consultant/advisory board roles with Bristol-Myers Squibb.