This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
Aspirin use reduced BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer risk
Regular aspirin use was associated with reductions in BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer risk, but not BRAF-mutated cancer risk, according to study results.
The aim of the study was to evaluate links between aspirin intake and colorectal cancer risk, and whether that risk differs based on tumor BRAF oncogene mutation status.
Researchers culled data from participants in the Nurses’ Health Study, which began in 1980, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, which began in 1986. Participants were followed for cancer incidence until July 1, 2006, and for cancer-associated mortality until Jan. 1, 2012.
Colorectal cancer incidence according to BRAF status served as the primary outcome measure.
The full cohort included 127,865 participants and 3,165,985 person-years of follow-up.
Molecular data were available for 1,226 incident rectal and colon cancers.
Multivariate analysis showed regular aspirin use lowered BRAF wild-type cancer risk compared with non-use (HR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83). The age-adjusted incidence rate difference for this result was –9.7 (95% CI, –12.6 to –6.7 per 100,000 person-years).
The link persisted regardless of tumor PTGS2 expression, or PIK3CA or KRAS mutation status.
Multivariable results also indicated that regular aspirin use failed to lower cancer BRAF-mutated tumor risk (HR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.76-1.38). The age-adjusted, incidence rate difference for this result was 0.7 (95% CI, –0.3 to 1.7 per 100,000 person-years).
Use of more than 14 aspirin tablets per week was associated with a lower BRAF wild-type cancer risk than no aspirin use (HR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; age-adjusted incidence rate difference, –19.8; 95% CI, –26.3 to –13.3 per 100,000 person-years).
The association between weekly aspirin intake and risk for colorectal disease differed significantly regarding mutation status in the BRAF gene (Pheterogeneity=.005).
Boris Pasche
“These findings suggest that BRAF-mutant colon tumor cells may be less sensitive to the effect of aspirin,” the researchers said, adding that further study may be necessary in light of the modest absolute risk difference.
In an accompanying editorial, Boris Pasche, MD, PhD, of the division of hematology/oncology in the department of medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, wrote that studies of the BRAF and PIK3CA genes provide critical information about the effect of aspirin in colorectal cancer.
“If validated in future studies, these findings suggest that the colorectal cancer preventive effect of aspirin in healthy individuals is predominantly mediated by its action on the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway,” he wrote. “Similarly, the improved outcome of patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumors suggests that, once colorectal cancer developed, aspirin may predominantly influence the PIK3-PTEN-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway.”
For more information:
Nishihara R. JAMA. 2013;309:2563-2571.
Pasche B. JAMA. 2013;309:2598-2599.
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.
Perspective
Back to Top
David H. Ilson, MD, PhD
Regular therapy with aspirin has been shown to have a significant impact on the development and natural history of colorectal cancer. Use of aspirin and similar agents that inhibit prostaglandin synthetic pathways reduces polyp formation in individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis. Several decades of regular aspirin use results in up to a 30%-50% reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer mortality as reported in two large patient population observational studies, the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professional Follow-Up Study. In addition, after curative colorectal cancer treatment, use of aspirin improves survival and reduces the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence.
Study of tumor tissue derived from patients in the Nurses’ and Health Professionals studies is now revealing potential mechanisms of aspirin as a preventive therapy, and whether specific molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer might be affected differently depending on tumor genomic profile.
The authors of the current study have pursued several hypothesis-driven analyses of colorectal cancer tissue from participants on these large studies. Because cyclooxygenases — and in particular, cyclooxygenase-2 — are targets of inhibition of aspirin, the investigators initially investigated expression of COX-2 as a potential predictive marker for a preventive effect of aspirin in colorectal cancer.
Overexpression in tumors of COX-2 by immunohistochemistry correlated with a preventive benefit for aspirin usage, with no benefit seen for normal COX-2 expression, supporting COX-2 as the potential chemoprevention target. A subsequent study, and the current study, explore potential genomic mutations in these tumors, with the hypothesis that mutations that potentially upregulate or enhance COX pathways might enhance the effect of aspirin as a preventive therapy, and conversely some activating genomic mutations might abrogate an aspirin effect. Activating mutations in PI3kinase, which are present in up to 10% of colorectal cancers and potentially impact downstream on COX-2, identified patients who had a reduced risk of colorectal cancer with aspirin, compared with no benefit seen in PI3 kinase wild-type tumors.
The current study evaluates BRAF mutation status in these tumors. Activating BRAF mutations, present in 5%-10% of colorectal cancers, may be important in downstream upregulation of COX-2 activity. The authors make a number of intriguing observations in this study. The relative reduction of colorectal cancer development is limited to the BRAF wild-type cancers, and the benefit shows an aspirin dose response and dose duration effect that lead to increasing risk reduction. Neither usage, dose nor duration of aspirin had any impact on development of BRAF-mutant cancers. Whereas COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry correlated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer in BRAF wild-type tumors, no impact was seen in BRAF-mutant tumors. No impact was seen for PI3 kinase mutation status and BRAF wild-type tumor risk and aspirin usage.
How will such studies be applied to clinical practice? We now have a better understanding how aspirin mediates cancer prevention. The results are hypothesis generating and suggest that aspirin therapy may exert risk reduction only in certain tumor molecular subtypes. Such a greater understanding may lead to more targeted use of chemopreventive strategies after colorectal cancer therapy. The problem however, is given that multiple potential biomarkers have been identified in these studies, which should be studied and validated in further analysis? Which, if any, of these biomarkers could potentially be used to select appropriate patients likely to benefit from aspirin therapy — or other preventive therapies — after curative treatment of incident colorectal cancer? Current practice is to recommend aspirin prophylaxis in patients with documented Lynch syndrome, and aspirin therapy is also recommended after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.
David H. Ilson, MD, PhD
HemOnc Today Editorial Board member
Disclosures: Ilson reports no relevant financial disclosures.