This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
Robotic-assisted prostatectomy cost significantly more compared with traditional surgery
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
In the first study to compare actual costs instead of anticipated costs, researchers have concluded the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy cost significantly more than radical retropubic prostatectomy.
The single-center study estimated that operating room supplies accounted for almost all of this increased cost.
Researchers looked at 473 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo either robotic-assisted (n=115) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (n=358) by one of four surgeons at a single institution.
The researchers found that although the length of hospital stay was similar between robotic-assisted (1.2 days) and radical retropubic (1.4 days), the overall cost for robotic-assisted surgery was 62% higher than that of traditional prostatectomy ($14,006 vs. $8,686; P<.05).
A majority of the additional costs were due to operating room costs such as purchasing and upkeep of the robotic equipment ($417 vs. $59; P<.05). Other costs associated with surgery — such as cardiology, imaging, administrative, laboratory and pharmacy costs — were similar between the two groups, with no statistically significant difference.
One limitation to the study is that it did not take into account long-term complications of the two surgery types. In addition, it only calculated patient costs and not costs associated with surgeon fees, loss of productivity or quality-of-life issues.
Collapse
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts