Surveyed population unhappy with USPSTF prostate screening recommendations
American Urological Association Annual Meeting
According to most men surveyed at the Duke Universitys annual free prostate cancer screening clinic, screening should not end at age 75 as recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Additionally, researchers from the university reported that men older than 75 have a higher risk for disease and poorer outcomes.
Almost 80% of the men [surveyed] were not in favor of the government recommendation, Judd Moul, MD, professor and chief of urology at Duke University and director of the Duke Prostate Center, told HemOnc Today. They didnt think it was appropriate to automatically use an age cutoff for screening.
Moul, who presented the study at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting, and colleagues surveyed 340 men and divided them into two groups based on age (younger than 75 or 75 and older), noncollege graduate or college graduate, self perceived knowledge of disease, awareness of screening guidelines, and opinion on discontinuing screening after age 75.
Comparison of Prostate Cancer-related Measures and Outcomes by Age Group |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Among those surveyed, 78.2% were upset about the USPSTF recommendations to discontinue screening among men aged 75 or older. There was no significant difference between education or age among men who were upset. However, self perceived knowledge of disease (P<.001) and knowledge of screening guidelines (P=.006) differed between education groups.
The researchers also used the prostate centers database to identify a cohort of 4,196 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2008. The men were stratified by age: younger than 65, 65 to 75 and older than 75 years.
Compared with men younger than 65 and those aged 65 to 75, men older than 75 had higher median PSA, pT3/4 disease and pathological Gleason .7, rate of metastasis and disease-specific mortality (see table).
It was not appropriate for the USPSTF to draw a line in the sand and use a 75 age cutoff; thats age discrimination, Moul said. They should try to take a more customized approach or make a recommendation thats more customized based on an individual mans risk for prostate cancer mortality. by Stacey L. Adams
For more information:
More AUA meeting highlights >>