Meta-analysis: Allogeneic stem cell transplant beneficial in intermediate-, poor-risk AML
According to data from a meta-analysis, allogeneic stem cell transplantation significantly improved relapse-free survival and OS in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission compared with nonallogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, allogeneic stem cell transplantation did not demonstrate benefit in good-risk AML in first complete remission.
Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to measure the benefit allogeneic stem cell transplantation provided in terms of relapse-free survival and OS in AML in first complete remission and for good-, intermediate- and poor-risk AML. The analysis identified 24 trials with 6,007 patients who were assigned to allogeneic SCT vs. non-allogeneic SCT. Trials reported relapse-free survival and OS.
According to a fixed-effects meta-analysis, for allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AML in first remission, the HR of relapse or death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86) compared with non-allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Relapse-free survival benefit was higher for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in poor-risk (HR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.84) and intermediate-risk AML (HR=0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85) compared with non-allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, allogeneic stem cell transplantation did not demonstrate benefit in good-risk AML (HR=1.06; 95% CI, 0.80-1.42).
In AML in first complete remission, the HR for death with allogeneic stem cell transplantation was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was associated with a significant benefit to OS in poor-risk (HR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and intermediate-risk AML (HR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93). However, there was no significant benefit for good-risk AML (HR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.83-1.38).
Koreth J. JAMA. 2009;301:2349-2361.