Immunochemical fecal occult blood tests viable alternative to colonoscopy
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Qualitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests could be used for mass screening as an alternative to colonoscopy, according to the results of a prospective, multicenter study conducted in Germany.
Researchers enrolled 1,319 patients. Thirty-one percent of patients had an adenoma; 10% had advanced adenoma.
The researchers tested fecal hemoglobin levels with five qualitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests: Bionexia FOB-plus (Dima), PreventID CC (Preventis), immoCARE-C (CAREdiagnostica), FOB advanced (Ulti Med) and QuickVue iFOB (Quidel). They used Bionexia Hb/Hp Complex (Dima) to test both fecal hemoglobin and hemoglobin-haptoglobin levels.
Two tests had specificity above 90%: immoCARE-C (96.7%) and FOB advanced (92.9%). Those two tests had the highest rates of detection for advanced adenoma: 25.4% for immoCARE-C and 26.9% for FOB advanced.
However, compared with immoCARE-C the FOB advanced test showed a higher sensitivity to detect other adenoma (4.7% vs. 13.8%) and any adenoma (11.4% vs. 18.0%). The guaiac-based HemOccult test had a 9.4% sensitivity to detect advanced adenoma and a 95.9% specificity.
Positive predictive values for the test ranged from a high of 60.5% for immoCARE-C and a low of 40.2% for QuickVue iFOB. Negative predictive values ranged from a low of 71.1% for immoCARE-C and a high of 76.0% for Bionexia Hb/Hp Complex.
The researchers wrote that qualitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests combine the advantages of immunochemical tests with the ease of use for mass screening of guaiac-based tests, and may become a viable alternative to colonoscopy. by Jason Harris
Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:162-169.
The strength of the study is that the researchers followed up with immediate colonoscopy so they had a direct assessment of the efficacy of the screening procedures. It's a very ambitious study and it does suggest that some of these newer products may offer some advantage, but these products have to be evaluated in a larger series, and we need an economic analysis to see if the cost differentials will be worth any improved rates of detection.
David H. Ilson, MD
HemOnc Today Editorial Board member