June 24, 2009
1 min read
Save

HPV testing added no benefit to liquid-based cytology for CIN detection

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia did not increase when HPV testing was combined with liquid-based cytology screening, according to the results of the U.K. ARTISTIC trial.

Liquid-based cytology is a liquid form of the Pap smear that has replaced conventional Pap cytology in the United Kingdom and a number of other developed countries, according to researchers.

The researchers enrolled 24,510 women aged 20 to 64 to compare liquid-based cytology plus HPV testing with liquid-based testing alone.

All women were assigned to combined HPV testing and liquid-based cytology screening; however, the results were both revealed and acted upon (n=18,386) in some women and concealed (n=6,124) in others. Follow-up screening occurred at year three when the primary outcome — the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia greater than grade 3 — was assessed.

At the first screening, the primary outcome occurred in 1.27% of the revealed group and 1.31% of the concealed group. At year three, the rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia greater than grade 3 decreased to 0.25% in the revealed group and 0.47% in the concealed group.

When both screenings were combined, the overall rate for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia greater than grade 3 was 1.51% in the revealed group and 1.77% in the concealed group.

Follow-up of the ARTISTIC trial will continue until six years postenrollment in order to determine if “HPV testing could extend screening intervals because of the longer duration of protection conferred by a negative HPV result than by a negative liquid-based cytology finding,” according to researchers.

Kitchener HC. Lancet Oncol. 2009;doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70156-1.