February 26, 2010
1 min read
Save

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy increased survival in some younger patients with early-stage breast cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improved five-year disease-specific mortality among women aged 18 to 49 years with early-stage ER–negative breast cancer, according to data collected in the SEER database.

Researchers reviewed data collected on 107,106 patients with unilateral disease who underwent mastectomy. Among those patients, 8,902 (8.3%) also had contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Patients who had contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were more likely to be younger non-Hispanic whites with earlier-stage disease.

Univariate analysis showed that contralateral prophylactic mastectomy was associated with improved disease-specific survival for women with stage I to III breast cancer (for death, HR=0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69).

After conducting risk-stratified multivariable regression analyses, the researchers found that in younger women with stage I or II ER–negative breast cancer, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy was associated with a reduction in the risk for disease-specific mortality (HR=0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.88). That was not the case among young women with early-stage ER–positive breast cancer.

These reductions translated into an increase in five-year adjusted breast cancer–specific survival of 4.8% (88.5% vs. 83.7%) in favor of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among the young, early-stage ER-negative group vs. 0.5% (96.4% vs. 95.9%) among ER–positive women.

In an adjusted analysis, the researchers observed that the cancer-related survival associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy declined with age. Women aged younger than 50 years had a modest risk reduction (HR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97), whereas patients aged older than 60 years saw no risk reduction.

Bedrosian I. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1-9.

More In the Journals summaries>>

Twitter Follow HemOncToday.com on Twitter.