May 30, 2009
1 min read
Save

5-FU, mitomycin-C confirmed as standard of care in anal cancer

Trial also found no added benefit of maintenance chemotherapy.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

2009 ASCO Annual Meeting

Six-month complete response rates were similar among patients with squamous cell anal carcinoma who received radiation therapy plus 5-FU in combination with either mitomycin-C or cisplatin, according to the results of the ACT II trial presented at the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting.

These data reinforce the utility of 5-FU plus mitomycin-C, which has been the standard-of-care for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus for the last 20 years.

“Overall outcome for patients in this trial is excellent, with a 95% complete response at six months and an 85% survival at three years, which are very good results relative to the international trials completed so far,” said Roger James, MD, a radiation oncologist at Maidstone Hospital in Kent, United Kingdom.

The ACT II trial, which enrolled 940 patients, was designed to examine two questions: whether treatment with cisplatin instead of mitomycin-C would improve survival and whether maintenance therapy would reduce recurrence.

At six months, response rate was 94% in the mitomycin-C group vs. 95% in the cisplatin group. Patients treated with cisplatin had fewer grade-3/4 hematologic toxicities compared with patients who received mitomycin-C (13.4% vs. 24.7%, P<.001).

Additional data from the trial indicated that recurrence-free survival was the same among patients who received two cycles of maintenance therapy (n=448) with cisplatin/5-FU compared with those who did not. Similarly, OS at three years was about 85% in both groups.

“Maintenance chemotherapy does not improve disease control or survival,” James said. –by Nicole Blazek

PERSPECTIVE

We can conclude from this study that the standard of care remains 5-FU/mitomycin radiation. There is no benefit to substitute cisplatin for mitomycin and there's no benefit for additional cycles of maintenance chemotherapy with 5-FU/cisplatin. A disappointing study, but it just substantiates the standard of care that is already in place. You can't always assume that a new treatment is better unless you compare it to a standard. Negative studies are very important because they show that these different treatment strategies like changing chemotherapy drugs or adding additional chemotherapy show no benefit.

- David Ilson, MD

HemOnc Today Editorial Board member

For more information: