Issue: June 10, 2011
June 10, 2011
2 min read
Save

Protein biomarker associated with improved survival in colorectal cancer

Morikowa T. JAMA. 2011;305:1685-1694.

Issue: June 10, 2011
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Activation of the protein biomarker CTNNB1 was associated with better colorectal cancer-specific survival and OS for obese patients with colorectal cancer.

Researchers reviewed data collected in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study on 955 patients with any stage colon or rectal cancer. Roughly 80% of patients had normal BMI, whereas 18.7% had a BMI of at least 30.

Half of the total cohort was positive for CTNNB1, including 20.6% of obese patients. Of the patients negative for CTNNB1, 16.7% were obese.

There were 440 deaths in 141 months of follow-up, including 266 deaths from colorectal cancer.

Obese patients positive for nuclear CTNNB1 (n=70) had significantly superior cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.49) and OS (HR=0.56, 95% CI, 0.35-0.90). Researchers also observed a similar but weaker positive effect of BMI using cytoplasmic CTNNB1 or membrane status.

Positive status for nuclear CTNNB1 was not significantly associated with cancer-specific survival for non-obese patients.

Five-year OS also favored positive nuclear CTNNB1, 77% vs. 74% (HR=0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.22), on stage-matched multivariate analysis.

Researchers found that a high-rate of post-diagnosis physical activity, defined as at least 18 metabolic equivalent task hours per week, improved colorectal cancer-specific survival in patients with negative nuclear CTNNB1 (HR=0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.81). Physical activity was not associated with improved disease-specific survival (HR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.50-2.30) or OS (HR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.55-1.34) for patients positive for CTNNB1.

PERSPECTIVE

Beta-catenin is a marker that's been evaluated in several other studies; none have shown a correlation between expression and outcome, and some have shown a negative correlation between nuclear expression and outcome. This is an interesting study, but it's hypothesis-generating at this point, rather than confirmatory or practice changing. The study is important because it's one of the few studies to look at a marker and its interaction between a modifiable patient characteristic. However, there is no good hypothesis generated in the study to explain why patients with a high BMI benefit from nuclear expression of beta-catenin, so it's not clear whether further studies would confirm this finding. It's not clear to me why patients who are overweight would benefit from a higher level of nuclear beta-catenin.

– Marwan Fakih, MD
Chief of the gastrointestinal section,
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.

Disclosure: Dr. Fakih reported no relevant financial interests.

Twitter Follow HemOncToday.com on Twitter.