June 28, 2018
2 min read
Save

Carotid in-stent restenosis may be more common than thought

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Among patients who underwent carotid artery stenting, in-stent restenosis of at least 50% was higher than some previous estimates, according to data presented at the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Annual Meeting.

However, in-stent restenosis of at least 80% and late neurologic events were uncommon, Grant Scott, MD, vascular surgery fellow at West Virginia University, said during a presentation.

Scott and colleagues retrospectively analyzed 450 patients (mean age, 68 years) who underwent CAS procedures and had their data collected prospectively.

“Most published studies have relatively short follow-up periods, which may lead to underestimating the incidence of carotid in-stent stenosis rates,” Scott and colleagues wrote in an abstract.

All patients had carotid duplex ultrasound immediately after the procedure and at 1, 6 and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Outcomes of interest included freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 50%, freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 80%, freedom from reintervention, survival, stroke and transient ischemic attack. Mean follow-up was 40.3 months.

Among the cohort, 45% had symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 65% had primary CAS and 35% had CAS due to post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis.

Late carotid in-stent restenosis of at least 50% was observed in 23% of patients, whereas late carotid in-stent restenosis of at least 80% was observed in 7.4% of patients, Scott said.

Late TIA occurred in 4.3% of patients and late stroke in 0.7%, whereas late reintervention was required in 5.2%, according to the researchers.

The rate of freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 50% was 85% at 1 year, 79% at 2 years, 75% at 3 years, 72% at 4 years and 70% at 5 years, whereas the rate of freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 80% was 96% at 1 year, 95% at 2 years, 93% at 3 years, 90% at 4 years and 89% at 5 years, Scott and colleagues found.

There was no difference between those who had primary CAS and those who had CAS due to post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis in freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 50% (P = .54) or freedom from in-stent restenosis of at least 80% (P = .516).

Freedom from reintervention was 98% at 1 year, 96% at 2 years, 93% at 3 years, 93% at 4 years and 91% at 5 years, and did not differ between those who had primary CAS and those who had CAS due to post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis (P = .939), according to the researchers.

Late survival rates were 99% at 1 year, 97% at 2 years, 96% at 3 years, 94% at 4 years and 91% at 5 years, Scott and colleagues found.

“The incidence of 50% in-stent restenosis is relatively high; however, the rates of

80% restenosis and late neurologic events are low,” Scott and colleagues wrote in the abstract. – by Erik Swain

Reference:

Scott G, et al. S5: Scientific Session 5. Presented at: Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Annual Meeting; June 20-23, 2018; Boston.

Disclosure: Cardiology Today’s Intervention could not confirm relevant financial disclosures at the time of publication.