We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.
Christopher P. Cannon
For patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI, bleeding risk was lower in those assigned dabigatran plus a P2Y12 inhibitor compared with those assigned warfarin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin, according to results published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Researchers from the RE-DUAL PCI trial assigned 2,725 patients with AF who underwent PCI to either triple therapy of warfarin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca) plus aspirin for 1 to 3 months or to dual therapy of dabigatran (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Only elderly patients outside the U.S. received the 110-mg dose of dabigatran.
“As many as 30% of people with [AF] have [CAD] that may require [PCI] with stenting. Before now, there has been limited research on the use of novel oral anticoagulants in this setting,” Christopher P. Cannon, MD, cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, executive director of cardiometabolic trials at Harvard Clinical Research Institute, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, said in a press release issued by Boehringer Ingelheim. “Because a rising number of these patients are already on [novel oral anticoagulant] treatment, we believe these results will provide important new insights for health care providers performing this procedure.”
The researchers also assessed noninferiority for dual therapy vs. triple therapy for a composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (MI/stroke/systemic embolism), death or unplanned revascularization.
The primary endpoint occurred in 15.4% of the 110-mg dual-therapy group and in 26.9% of the triple-therapy group (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.63), and in 20.2% of the 150-mg dual therapy group and 25.7% of the triple-therapy group minus elderly patients outside the U.S. (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.88), the researchers reported.
The dual-therapy regimen met the threshold for noninferiority for the composite efficacy endpoint (dual therapy, 13.7%; triple therapy, 13.4%; HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29; P for noninferiority = .005), according to the researchers.
Serious adverse events did not differ among the groups.
“In the dual-therapy regimens, each of the two doses of dabigatran led to a balance between the risk of bleeding and the prevention of thromboembolic events, which offers clinicians two additional options for the treatment of patients with varying risks of thromboembolic events and bleeding,” Cannon and colleagues wrote.
The results were also presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress. – by Erik Swain
Disclosure: The study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. Cannon reports he receives grant support and/or personal fees from Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, Arisaph Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kowa, Lipimedix, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi and Takeda. Please see the full study for a list of the other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.
We’re sorry, but an unexpected error has occurred.
Please refresh your browser and try again. If this error persists, please contact ITSupport@wyanokegroup.com for assistance.
Would you like to receive email reminders to complete your saved activities from Healio CME?
Activity saved! You'll receive reminders to complete your saved activities from Healio CME.