July 11, 2017
4 min read
Save

Positive airway pressure fails to improve CV outcomes in sleep apnea

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Positive airway pressure for the treatment of patients with sleep apnea did not reduce risk for CV outcomes or death, according to a study published in JAMA.

Jie Yu, MD, of the department of cardiology at Peking University in Beijing, and colleagues analyzed data from 7,266 adults (mean age, 61 years; 80.5% men) from 10 randomized trials who were assigned continuous positive airway pressure, adaptive servo-ventilation or sham positive airway pressure. The patients had central sleep apnea or obstructive sleep apnea.

The composite outcomes of interest included major adverse CV events with hospitalization for unstable angina and major adverse CV events (nonfatal acute ACS, CV death and nonfatal stroke). Cause-specific outcomes were defined as fatal or nonfatal stroke, fatal or nonfatal ACS, fatal or hospitalized HF and hospitalization for unstable angina. Researchers also studied CV death, all-cause death and non-CV death.

Adverse CV events

Among the cohort, there were 635 major adverse CV events with hospitalization for angina, 356 major adverse CV events and 613 deaths, the researchers reported.

Positive airway pressure was not linked to major adverse CV events (RR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53-1.13; risk difference [RD] = –0.01; 95% CI, –0.03 to 0.01), major adverse CV events with hospitalization for unstable angina (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.71-1.2; RD = –0.01; 95% CI, –0.03 to 0.01), CV death (RR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88-1.5; RD = 0; 95% CI, –0.02 to 0.02) and all-cause death (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.99-1.29; RD = 0; 95% CI, –0.01 to 0.01). Stroke (RR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.66-1.21; RD = 0; 95% CI, –0.02 to 0.01), ACS (RR = 1; 95% CI, 0.65-1.55; RD = 0; 95% CI, –0.02 to 0.01) and HF (RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.16; RD = 0; 95% CI, –0.01 to 0.01) were also not associated with positive airway pressure.

Associations did not differ between continuous positive airway pressure and adaptive servo-ventilation (all P value homogeneity > .24). Meta-regressions did not determine links between positive airway pressure and outcomes for follow-up duration, levels of apnea severity or adherence to treatment (all P values > .13).

Positive airway pressure recommendations

“Based on the available evidence, it is reasonable to recommend [positive airway pressure] therapy for the improvement of symptoms in patients with [obstructive sleep apnea], but not for protection against vascular disease or death,” Yu and colleagues wrote. “It is possible that an enhanced evidence base able to better explore effects in patient subgroups might identify protective effects of [positive airway pressure] treatment for some patient subsets. In the meantime, these data emphasize the importance of proven therapies, such as [BP] lowering, lipid lowering and antiplatelet therapy in patients with sleep apnea, who should be treated according to established guidelines for patients at elevated [CV] risk.”

In a related editorial, Daniel J. Gottlieb, MD, MPH, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, associate physician in the division of sleep and circadian disorders in Brigham and Women’s Hospital and director of the Sleep Disorders Center at VA Boston Healthcare System, wrote: “Aside from limited clinical situations such as resistant hypertension, the principal indication for [obstructive sleep apnea] treatment at this time is control of [obstructive sleep apnea] symptoms. The lack of clear [CV] benefit should alleviate ethical concerns about withholding [positive airway pressure] therapy, even from severely affected individuals, in the context of clinical trials with informed consent.” – by Darlene Dobkowski

Disclosures: Yu reports no relevant financial disclosures. Gottlieb reports receiving personal fees from Vivus. Please see the full study for a list of the other researchers’ relevant financial disclosures.