May 11, 2017
3 min read
Save

Transcatheter leadless pacemaker successful in real-world setting

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

CHICAGO — A transcatheter leadless pacemaker had a high implant success rate and a low rate of major complications at 30 days, according to post-approval registry data presented at the Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions.

In the Micra IDE trial, which led to FDA approval of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (Medtronic), the implant success rate was greater than 99%, all efficacy and safety endpoints were met and the rate of major complications was low, researcher Mikhael F. El-Chami, MD, FHRS, director of electrophysiology at Emory Midtown and associate professor of medicine at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, said during his presentation.

To determine whether these results bear out in a real-world setting, El-Chami and colleagues evaluated post-approval registry data of patients implanted with the leadless pacemaker.

Mikhael F. El-Chami, MD, FHRS
Mikhael F. El-Chami

 

In the ongoing, prospective, single-arm, observational study, the researchers compared data on the rate of system- or procedure-related major complications at 30 days after implantation in the 795 registry patients (mean age, 75 years; 62% men) with the rate found in the 726 patients from the investigational trial. Pacing capture thresholds at 0.24 ms at implant or prehospital discharge were also assessed.

Successful implantation occurred in all but three of the 795 patients (99.6%). At 30 days after implantation, 13 major complications occurred in 12 patients, translating to a rate of 1.51% (95% CI, 0.78-2.62). These complications included cardiac effusion or perforation (0.13%), device dislodgement (0.13%) and sepsis (0.13%), and the overall complication rate was numerically lower in the registry than in the investigational trial (1.51% vs. 2.89%; OR = 0.515; 95% CI, 0.251-1.053). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance, El-Chami said.

There were 22 deaths, six of which were cardiac, 12 of which were noncardiac and four of which had an unknown cause. One death from pulmonary edema related to aortic valve disease was adjudicated as related to the procedure, and no deaths were related to the device, El-Chami said. The 6-month Kaplan-Meier rate of all-cause mortality was 8.6% (95% CI, 5.3-13.6).

Additionally, the average pacing threshold at implant or prehospital discharge was 0.66 volts, which remained stable through the study duration, and the estimated battery longevity exceeded 12 years.

Importantly, the study population was diverse, El-Chami noted. The device was implanted by 149 operators — 86.6% of whom were new implanters — at 96 centers in 20 countries. Baseline characteristics were also typical for patients referred for a single-lead pacemaker, but, he said, it is important to note that 20.9% of patients in the registry had a condition that precluded the use of a transvenous pacemaker and 14.5% had a previously implanted cardiac electronic device, which were exclusion criteria for the investigational trial.

PAGE BREAK

“These results are definitely encouraging. They show that the Micra leadless pacemaker, when implanted in a real-world setting and in the hands of new operators, can be implanted successfully with a very low complication rate,” El-Chami told Cardiology Today.

“Part of the endpoint of this post-approval registry is to look at intermediate and long-term outcomes. The first time this pacemaker was ever implanted in humans was in December 2013, so as with any new technology, it’s important to follow the performance. This registry was designed to follow all enrolled patients for 9 years, so I’m sure we will see interesting results in the future,” he said. – by Melissa Foster

Reference:

El-Chami MF. LBCT01-04. Presented at: Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions; May 10-13, 2017; Chicago.

Disclosure : The study was funded by Medtronic. El-Chami reports receiving compensation for services from Boston Scientific and Medtronic.