ENSURE-AF: Edoxaban noninferior to standard anticoagulation before cardioversion in patients with AF
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion, edoxaban conferred similar outcomes to the standard care of warfarin plus enoxaparin, according to findings from the ENSURE-AF study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress.
“At a practical level, our study results show that newly diagnosed nonanticoagulated AF patients can start edoxaban as early as 2 hours prior to their cardioversion procedure if they have access to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or 3 weeks prior without,” Andreas Goette, MD, from the departments of cardiology and intensive care medicine, St. Vincenz-Hospital, Paderborn, Germany, said in a press release.
Andreas Goette
Goette and colleagues performed a randomized, open-label, phase 3b trial of 2,199 patients at 239 centers in 19 countries requiring cardioversion for nonvalvular AF (mean age, 64 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.6; standard deviation, 1.4). Patients were randomly assigned edoxaban (Savaysa, Daiichi Sankyo) 60 mg per day (reduced to 30 mg per day in cases of low body weight, low creatinine clearance or P-glycoprotein inhibitor use) or warfarin plus enoxaparin.
The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, MI and CV death. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in patients receiving at least one dose of the study drug. Follow-up was for 28 days on the study drug after cardioversion plus an additional 30 days for safety evaluation. The results were simultaneously published in The Lancet.
Among those assigned warfarin, mean time in therapeutic range was 70.8% (standard deviation, 27.4). Unlike warfarin, edoxaban, an oral Factor Xa inhibitor, does not require regular monitoring, Goette said in the release.
During the study period, the primary efficacy endpoint occurred in five (< 1%) patients assigned edoxaban vs. 11 (1%) assigned warfarin plus enoxaparin (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.12-1.43), according to the researchers.
The primary safety endpoint occurred in 16 (1%) of those who took at least one dose of edoxaban vs. 11 (1%) of those who took at least one dose of warfarin plus enoxaparin (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 0.64-3.55).
“Edoxaban had similar rates of major bleeding and thromboembolism compared to well-managed, optimized enoxaparin/warfarin therapy,” Goette said in the release. “The results were similar whether TEE guidance was used or not, whether patients had received prior anticoagulation or not, and in patients with a broad range of associated comorbidities.”
Howard Rutman, MD, vice president of medical affairs for Daiichi Sanyko, told Cardiology Today that the results “may have important clinical implications for newly diagnosed nonanticoagulated [patients with AF] needing to undergo cardioversion. … We are pleased with the results from ENSURE-AF, which expand our understanding of the use of once-daily edoxaban” in that population.
While ENSURE-AF was the largest randomized trial of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion, “it’s important to broaden scientific knowledge about the safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in AF procedures undergoing a range of [CV] procedures,” Rutman said. – by Erik Swain
References:
Goette A, et al. Hot Line: Preventive strategies 2. Presented at: European Society of Cardiology Congress; Aug. 27-31, 2016; Rome.
Goette A, et al. Lancet. 2016;doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31474-X.
Disclosure: The study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo. Goette reports consulting for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer, and speaking for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer and Sanofi Aventis. Rutman is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo.