July 31, 2015
2 min read
Save

RITA-3: Routine arteriography fails to show 10-year survival benefit

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

New 10-year follow-up data from the RITA-3 trial show no survival benefit associated with a routine early invasive strategy of coronary arteriography and myocardial revascularization compared with a selective invasive strategy of coronary arteriography for recurrent ischemia only among patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS.

The long-term data are in contrast to previously reported 5-year data, which demonstrated a 24% reduction in the odds of all-cause mortality with the routine early invasive approach.

Researchers for the British Heart Foundation RITA-3 randomized trial compared long-term outcomes for the routine early invasive strategy compared with the selective invasive strategy in 1,810 patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS (NSTEACS).

At 10 years, the rate of all-cause mortality was 25.1% in the routine early invasive strategy group vs. 25.4% in the selective invasive strategy group (P = .94) and the rate of CV mortality was 15.1% vs. 16.1%, respectively (P = .65).

“The mortality curves diverged over the first 5 years, but then progressively converged over the following 5 to 10 years,” the researchers wrote.

From years 0 to 5, the HR for all-cause mortality was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59-0.98) in the routine early invasive strategy group vs. the selective invasive strategy group. The HR for all-cause mortality was increased from years 5 to 10 (HR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.98-1.68). The researchers reported a similar trend for CV mortality (HR during years 0 to 5 = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; HR during years 5 to 10 = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.7-1.83).

When the researchers used a modified Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score to stratify patients, those classified as low risk had a 10-year mortality rate of 14.4% vs. 56.2% for those classified as high risk. Intervention strategy had no effect on this survival trend, according to the researchers.

Predictors of 10-year mortality included age, history of MI, HF, smoking status, diabetes, heart rate and ST segment depression, according to results of a multivariable analysis.

“The advantage of reduced mortality of a routine early invasive strategy seen at 5 years attenuated during later follow-up,”’ the researchers concluded. “Further trials of contemporary intervention strategies in patients with NSTEACS are warranted.” – by Rob Volansky

Disclosure: The researchers report receiving a donation from Aventis Pharma. One researcher reports receiving grant support from The Medicines Company. All other researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.