January 14, 2015
2 min read
Save

New analysis finds no association between statins, cognitive impairment

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials yielded no significant association between statin therapy and cognitive impairment.

Perspective from Joseph S. Alpert, MD, MACP

This finding conflicts with an FDA warning issued in 2012 regarding potential adverse effects of statins on cognition, which was based on feedback from the Adverse Events Reporting System and a literature review, according to the study background.

“Given these results, it is questionable whether the FDA class warning about potential cognitive adverse effects of statins is still warranted,” Brian R. Ott, MD, director of the Alzheimer’s Disease and Memory Disorders Center at Rhode Island Hospital and professor of neurology at Alpert Medical School at Brown University, said in a press release.

Ott and colleagues identified 25 placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials published by December 2012 that reported cognitive outcomes (n=46,836). Of those, 23 trials reported cognitive test results (n=29,012).

According to the results, adverse cognitive outcomes attributable to statin therapy were rarely reported, whether the trials involved individuals with normal or impaired cognition.

A meta-analysis of cognitive test data from 27,643 participants in 14 studies also showed no significant adverse events of statin therapy on all tests of cognition, both in participants with normal cognition (standardized mean difference, 0.01; 95% CI, –0.01 to 0.03) and those with Alzheimer’s disease (standardized mean difference, –0.05; 95% CI, –0.19 to 0.1).

For cognitive domains such as memory, which had a large sample size, confidence intervals were narrow and excluded even very small differences. However, for domains such as working memory, which had limited data, confidence intervals were wide; thus, large beneficial or harmful effects could not be excluded, according to the researchers.

“In terms of an overall signal, however, our analysis of [standardized mean differences] for all cognitive outcomes do not confirm the signal detected from spontaneous adverse event reports. … The risks for cognition, if any, are likely outweighed by the beneficial effects of adherence to statin therapy on [CV] and cerebrovascular disease,” they wrote.

Disclosure: The study was supported in part by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ott reports receiving grant support from Avid, Baxter, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Pfizer, Roche and TauRx, and consultant support from Accera.