September 01, 2014
3 min read
Save

ATLANTIC: Pre-hospital ticagrelor did not benefit reperfusion but lowered stent thrombosis in STEMI

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

BARCELONA, Spain — Although safe, pre-hospital administration of ticagrelor did not improve pre-PCI coronary reperfusion in patients with acute STEMI when compared with in-hospital administration of the drug, according to data presented here at ESC Congress.

Perspective from W. Douglas Weaver, MD

“[Pre-hospital ticagrelor administration] may, however, reduce the risk of stent thrombosis after PCI,” Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD, of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, said at a press conference.

Montalescot presented data from the ATLANTIC trial showing no difference between pre-hospital and in-hospital administration of ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca) in the two co-primary endpoints: absence of ST-segment elevation resolution ≥70% before PCI (pre-hospital, 86.8% vs. in-hospital, 87.6%; OR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.69-1.25; P=.63); and absence of TIMI flow grade 3 in infarct-related arteries at initial angiography (pre-hospital, 82.6% vs. in-hospital, 83.1%; OR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.25; P=.82).

Gilles Montalescot

Gilles Montalescot

Secondary endpoint analysis showed that the absence of ST-segment elevation resolution ≥70% after PCI was 42.5% in the pre-hospital group and 47.5% in the in-hospital group (OR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.004; P=.05), and absence of TIMI flow grade 3 in infarct-related arteries after PCI was 17.8% in the pre-hospital cohort and 19.6% in the in-hospital cohort (OR=0.88; 95% CI, 0.68-1.14; P=.34).

Additionally, rates of non-CABG-related bleeding events within 48 hours and after 48 hours and up to 30 days did not differ between groups, nor did rates of MACE. However, definite stent thrombosis at 30 days after index PCI was lower in the pre-hospital group (0.2% vs. 1.2%; OR=0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.86; P=.02).

In the PLATO trial, in-hospital ticagrelor significantly reduced stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel, Montalescot said. He added that ATLANTIC investigators “observed the same rate of stent thombosis in the group receiving in-hospital ticagrelor, but there was a highly significant reduction with pre-hospital administration of ticagrelor.”

For the international, randomized, multicenter, double blind ATLANTIC trial, Montalescot and colleagues enrolled 1,862 patients with ongoing STEMI of less than 6 hours of duration. They compared pre-hospital (in the ambulance; n=906) and in-hospital (in the cath lab; n=952) administration of the direct-acting P2Y12 receptor inhibitor ticagrelor. Patients were randomly assigned to angiography at a median of 48 minutes, whereas the median time difference between the two treatment strategies was 31 minutes. – by Brian Ellis

For more information:

Montalescot G. Hot line: Myocardial infarction. Presented at: the European Society of Cardiology Congress; Aug. 30-Sept. 3, 2014; Barcelona, Spain.

Montalescot G. N Engl J Med. 2014;doi:10.1056/nejmao1407024.

Disclosure: Montalescot reports receiving grant support from Abbott Vascular, Daiichi Sankyo, Nonospheres and Stentys; and grant support and personal fees from Accumetrics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CFR, Eli Lilly, Europa, GLG, Iroko Cardio International, Lead-Up, Luminex, McKinsey, Medtronic, Menarini, Pfizer, Remedica, Sanofi Aventis, Servier and The Medicines Company.