Issue: November 2012
September 07, 2012
2 min read
Save

Catheter ablation for AF showed promising 1-year results

Issue: November 2012
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

MUNICH — One-year data from the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Study demonstrate that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is safe and suppresses arrhythmia recurrence in 74% of patients after a single procedure.

Additionally, catheter ablation for AF was associated with a significant reduction at 1 year in arrhythmia-related symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath, fatigue or dizziness that were present in 86% of patients before the procedure.

The prospective, multicenter, observational Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Study is the first European registry to evaluate the real-life epidemiology of catheter ablation for AF, according to a press release. Researchers recruited 1,410 patients from 10 European countries. Results from the in-hospital phase of the study were presented at the European Society of Cardiology 2011 Congress, showing that two-thirds of patients having catheter ablation have paroxysmal AF and up to 40% have no apparent underlying cardiac disorder.

Elena Arbelo, MD 

Elena Arbelo

Elena Arbelo, MD, of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, presented results from the 1-year follow-up visit at this year’s Congress.

At a press conference, Arbelo said 77% of patients visited the clinic in person for review; however, at 1 year, 42% of evaluations were conducted by telephone.

In other results:

  • More than half of patients became asymptomatic after the ablation procedure.
  • Seventy-six percent of patients had a periodical ECG to document arrhythmia recurrence, and only half of patients had Holter monitoring.
  • One-third of patients had a transthoracic echocardiogram during follow-up; cardiac CT or MRI tests were rare.
  • About 20% of patients required a second ablation procedure.
  • At 1 year, about half of patients were taking anticoagulants and 32% were taking antiarrhythmic drugs. At discharge, 97% of patients had been prescribed anticoagulants and 67% had been prescribed antiarrhythmic medications.
  • Ablation was considered successful in 74% of patients, who had no documented arrhythmias after a 3-month blanking period.

Complications during the first year of follow-up were infrequent and occurred in just 2.6% of patients. Adverse events were mainly related to cerebrovascular events (0.54%) or vascular injuries (071%). Four deaths occurred; one secondary to hemorrhagic stroke, one following ischemic ventricular fibrillation, one to a non-CV cause and one of unknown origin, according to the press release.

“However, the perioperative complication rate is not negligible — 7.7%; 1.7% was major — and must be weighed,” Arbelo said during a press conference.

The mean age of the patients included in the study was 60 years; 28% were women; two-thirds had paroxysmal AF and 38% had lone AF.

“There are obvious differences in patient characteristics between patients undergoing AF catheter ablation to the overall population suffering from AF — they are younger with paroxysmal AF with no underlying heart disease and [are mostly] women,” Arbelo said.

The researchers concluded that the 1-year pilot study data provide “crucial information on AF ablation in clinical practice across Europe.”

“(However), there is clearly a gap between recommendations and the actual clinical practice that should be considered in the future, including anticoagulation and antiarrhytmic medication management and type and frequency of follow-up,” Arbelo said.

For more information:

Arbelo E. Hot line III: Late breaking trials on arrhythmias and CAD. Presented at: the European Society of Cardiology Congress; Aug. 25-29, 2012; Munich.

Arbelo E. Europace. 2012;14:1094-1103.

Disclosure: Arbelo reports no relevant financial disclosures.