Issue: March 2012
March 01, 2012
2 min read
Save

Thrombolysis safe for treating ‘wake-up’ stroke patients

Issue: March 2012
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

International Stroke Conference 2012

NEW ORLEANS — Thrombolysis with clot-busting drugs may be safe for patients who wake up experiencing stroke symptoms, according to preliminary data presented at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference.

“The easy answer [as to why patients with wake-up stroke are excluded from treatment] is that there is no evidence, so you don’t know the risk–benefit ratio,” Dulka Manawadu, MD, stroke medical consultant at King’s College Hospital, London, U.K., said during a press conference. However, results from some studies show that wake-up stroke patients, who do not receive thrombolysis, have poorer outcomes than those with other types of stroke.

Dulka Manawadu, MD
Dulka Manawadu
Courtesy of the American Heart Association

Using registry data, the researchers compared clot-busting therapy with alteplase (Activase, Genentech) received by 326 patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and 68 wake-up stroke patients with unknown symptom onset. Wake-up stroke patients received clot-busting treatments if their clinical presentation and early stroke changes in CT scan images were comparable to those treated with a known time of onset. All patients received treatment in the same London medical center. Researchers did not randomly assign patients to receive different treatments for comparison, according to the press release.

Both groups had similar BP, blood glucose levels and NIH Stroke Scale scores. Although the two groups were comparable for mean age and vascular risks, more women experienced wake-up strokes (66% vs. 52%).

CT perfusion was performed in 26% of patients within 4.5 hours and 67% of wake-up stroke patients (P<.0001). Door-to-needle time was 59 minutes and 73 minutes, respectively (P=.11). The researchers observed no differences in mean NIH Stroke Score at 24 hours (9.2 vs. 8.1), intracranial hemorrhage (17% vs. 22%), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (2.5% vs. 2.9%) and premorbid Rankin Score of 0 to 2 at 3 months (49% vs. 37%) between patients treated within 4.5 hours and wake-up stroke patients.

At 3 months, mortality was lower in thrombolysed wake-up stroke patients (15% vs. 24%; P=.063); this finding became significant after researchers adjusted for covariates in multiple regression (P=.024).

Doctors may be reluctant to give clot-busting drugs to patients in whom the time of stroke onset is not known because the risks for bleeding are not known, Manawadu said. However, a significant proportion of patients who have stroke symptoms upon waking may have suffered stroke in the early hours of the morning and may still be within the window of time when clot-busting treatments are known to be effective.

“According to this study, thrombolizing wake-up stroke patients is feasible and safe,” Manawadu said. “I think the time is now right to prospectively randomize these patients with wake-up stroke into trials of thrombolysis.”

For more information:

Disclosure: Dr. Manawadu received institutional grants from Kings College Hospital.

PERSPECTIVE

Wake-up strokes comprise about 14% of ischemic strokes presenting to EDs and a recent study estimated that 58,000 Americans present to an ED with a wake-up stroke every year. This is a key area of interest for researchers. The data on whether it is safe and effective to treat patients with wake-up strokes has been mixed thus far, and this study is a welcome addition to the literature. Some researchers are using advanced imaging techniques to try to identify those patients most likely to benefit from intervention. Carefully conducted, rigorous trials are crucial for determining whether there are patients with wake-up strokes who would benefit from intervention.

Jason Mackey, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurology
Indiana University School of Medicine

Disclosure: Dr. Mackey reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Twitter Follow CardiologyToday.com on Twitter.