June 09, 2010
1 min read
Save

DAPC: Cilostazol inhibited carotid intima-media thickness in setting of type 2 diabetes

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Cilostazol compared with aspirin reduced the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes, according to findings from the DAPC study.

Researchers from Japan and Korea conducted this prospective, randomized, blinded endpoint study in four eastern Asian countries. The patients with type 2 diabetes (n=329) and suspected peripheral arterial disease were assigned to either an aspirin treatment group (81-100 mg/d; n=166) or a cilostazol treatment group (100-200 mg/d; n=163). After 32 patients were excluded for withdrawing consent, dropping out before treatment or having no baseline intima-media thickness, 297 patients remained for final analysis (n=152 for aspirin; n=145 for cilostazol).

Patients treated with cilostazol (Pletal, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals) showed a greater regression in maximum left (–0.088 ± 0.260 vs. 0.059 ± 0.275 mm, P<.001), maximum right (–0.042 ± 0.274 vs. 0.045 ± 0.216 mm, P=.003), mean left (–0.043 ± 0.182 vs. 0.028 ± 0.202 mm, P=.004) and mean right (–0.024 ± 0.182 vs. 0.048 ± 0.169 mm, P<.001) common carotid artery intima-media thickness compared to those taking aspirin. Additionally, researchers reported no significant differences between the two groups in major CV events.

Cilostazol potently inhibited progression of carotid intima-media thickness, an established surrogate marker of CV events, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus suspected of having PAD compared with aspirin,” the researchers wrote. “A large-scale prospective trial is needed to establish the usefulness of cilostazol for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.”

Katakami N. Circulation. 2010;121:2584-2591.

Twitter Follow CardiologyToday.com on Twitter.