Issue: July 2008
July 01, 2008
1 min read
Save

Laser lead extraction removed cardiac leads safely, effectively

Issue: July 2008
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A new retrospective study examined the indications, complications and outcomes of 498 transvenous lead extraction procedures at a high-volume extraction center.

After a seven-year analysis, the researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School concluded that the excimer laser sheath (Spectranetics Corporation) was safe and successful in removing pacing and defibrillator leads. Laser sheath technology uses ultraviolet light to ablate scar tissue that holds problematic leads in place.

In the analysis, 975 endovascular leads were removed from nearly 500 patients from January 2000 to March 2007. More than 97% of leads were successfully and completely removed.

The mean length of implantation was 5.7 years. Extraction using laser assistance was more likely with leads implanted longer than 3.4 years compared with those implanted less than 3.4 years (OR=6.15), the researchers wrote. In addition, extraction was more likely with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads compared with pacemaker leads (OR=3.44).

A small number of major complications were reported — two — which resulted in a major complication rate of just 0.4%. Only one patient required cardiac surgery, and no deaths were reported. – by Katie Kalvaitis

HeartRhythm. 2008;4:520-525.

PERSPECTIVE

Lead extraction is an important part of device implantation. Technological advances have helped accomplish extraction by freeing up leads that are scarred in place. This single-center experience demonstrates, as with most procedures, that high volume operators have better success and fewer complications. Physicians who extract leads infrequently should consider sending their patients to centers where the procedure is performed often.

– Douglas P. Zipes, MD
Cardiology Today Section Editor