Issue: February 2010
February 01, 2010
1 min read
Save

Additional rest imaging not required in patients with normal-appearing SPECT stress imaging

Issue: February 2010
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Patients who had a normal SPECT based on stress imaging alone had a similar low mortality rate as patients who underwent stress and rest imaging in a new study.

“Our findings support that patients who have a normal-appearing initial stress SPECT do not require additional rest imaging,” the researchers wrote. “This imaging strategy will significantly reduce radiation exposure in a substantial number of patients,” the researchers wrote.

Researchers evaluated all-cause mortality in 16,854 consecutive patients who had a normal gated stress SPECT (stress only protocol, 47.6%; stress and imaging, 52.4%).

After 4.5 years of follow-up, the overall unadjusted annual mortality rate was lower in patients who had a normal SPECT with a stress only protocol vs. patients who required both stress and rest imaging (2.57% vs. 2.92%; P=.02). The researchers reported no significant differences in mortality between the two protocols after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics. However, the stress-only protocol group had a 61% lower radiopharmaceutical dosage.

Increasing age, male sex, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease and inability to exercise independently predicted worse survival (P<.001 for all). Type of SPECT protocol was not an independent predictor.

Chang SM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:221-230.