Femoracetabular Impingement
Psychological readiness may impact return to sport after hip arthroscopy
Surgeons weigh surgical options for primary hip labral tears
Study: Hip arthroscopy is safe and effective in young patients
Fascia iliaca block did not reduce morphine equivalent dose after hip arthroscopy
At Issue: Hip labral reconstruction
The indications for acetabular labral reconstruction are controversial. The literature is full of reports that show good results with labral treatment ranging from minimal debridement to repair or segmental reconstruction and ultimately to circumferential reconstruction. Also reflected in the literature is the shared experience of surgeons who have dedicated their careers to helping people with non-arthritic hip problems. In other words, some times it may not matter how we treat the labrum; other times it matters quite a bit. Widely cited work that shows superior results with repair vs. debridement suggests that patients who underwent debridement, but did not fare well had undertreated labral pathology. However, we must be aware that the majority of these patients still did well. We can infer from such results, as well as from many other published reports and our shared experience, that how we treat the labrum does matter to a consequential percentage of our patients.
MRI-, CT-based 3D models had similar diagnostic values for femoroacetabular impingement
PROMIS may be valid, efficient measure for femoroacetabular impingement
Fellow provides testimony about EFORT Visiting Fellowships Programme in Paris
Poor preoperative mental health status linked to worse outcomes after hip arthroscopy
BOSTON — Results presented at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting showed preoperative mental health status was more predictive of 1-year patient-reported outcomes of hip pain and function compared with intraoperative findings during hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.
Hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction improved outcomes at 5 years
Published results showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 5 years among patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with segmental labral reconstruction. These results were comparable with patients who underwent primary labral repair, except primary labral reconstruction resulted in lower patient satisfaction scores.