Cardiovascular risk underestimated in women, younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
Cardiovascular disease incidence among women and patients younger than 55 years with rheumatoid arthritis is higher than their typical “low risk” classification would suggest, according to data published in Arthritis Research & Therapy.
“Current algorithms developed to predict CVD, such as the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation score (SCORE), underestimate the risk in RA patients, especially in those patients originally classified as having low or intermediate risk,” Daphne C. Rohrich, MSc, of Sint Maartenskliniek, in Ubbergen, Netherlands, and colleagues wrote. “It is well known that older age leads to higher CV risk in the general population. Likewise, males are at greater risk compared to females.”
“However, the results of a recent meta-analysis suggested that compared to the general population, younger RA patients bear the greatest relative risk of developing CV events, whereas older RA patients seem to have similar relative risks when compared to age-matched counterparts,” they added. “Furthermore, women with RA seem to be at a greater CV risk than those without RA. Early menopause seems to be a predictor for RA, and in addition, early menopause in women with RA may lead to a higher CVD risk. Therefore, one can suggest that gender and age are likely to have a distinct impact on CVD risk in RA patients than in the general population.”
To examine whether gender and age contribute to the misclassification of cardiovascular risk among patients with RA, Rohrich and colleagues prospectively collected data from the Nijmegen inception cohort. This cohort included patients diagnosed with RA at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, in the Netherlands, since 1985, as well as those from Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen since 1990. The researchers analyzed data on cardiovascular risk factors and incident events, with a follow-up period of up to 10 years. In all, 863 patients with RA, with 128 incident cardiovascular events, were included in the study.
Rohrich and colleagues used both the original and the EULAR-modified (M)_SCORE algorithms to calculate cardiovascular risk. The researchers stratified patients into deciles according to predicted risk, using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test to verify concordance between observed and predicted risk, in subgroups based on gender and age.
According to the researchers, there was evidence of a discrepancy between the predicted and observed cardiovascular risks (H-L test P < .003), primarily among women (H-L test P < .001), when using the SCORE algorithms for all patients. More than a third — 36% — of women with a cardiovascular event belonged to the low cardiovascular risk group, compared with just 10% among men with RA. Regarding age, researchers found a discrepancy only in those younger than 55 years (H-L test P < .001), with an overall underestimation of cardiovascular risk — 5.3% predicted compared with 8% observed.
The M_SCORE algorithm produced similar results.
“The results of our study suggest that the incidence of CVD among women and young RA patients initially assigned to the low-risk category is higher than predicted using current algorithms,” Rohrich and colleagues wrote. “Consequently, the CV risk in these subgroups seems underestimated.”
“Whether modifying the weight for the female gender and/or younger age in the risk algorithms would result in better CV risk predictions in RA remains a subject to be investigated in future studies,” they added. “Alternatively, other strategies (eg, biomarkers, cIMT, or CAC measurements) aiming at the same goal could be envisaged in order to improve CV risk management in patients with RA and/or other chronic inflammatory conditions.”