Read more

July 23, 2020
3 min read
Save

Adding colchicine to prevent gout flares while initiating allopurinol 'very cost effective'

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Despite its increased cost in the United States, colchicine use to prevent gout flares while starting treatment with allopurinol remains “very cost effective,” according to findings published in Arthritis Care & Research.

“Allopurinol is the core therapy for gout, and starting it can be challenging because it can actually precipitate flares of gout,” Philip C. Robinson, MBChB, PhD, FRACP, of Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, and the University of Queensland, in Australia, told Healio Rheumatology. “Using colchicine prophylaxis when commencing allopurinol is very important to preventing flares and making sure people continue on the allopurinol, and consequently control their gout. However, it can be very expensive in the United States, and there may be push back from insurers to fund this drug as well as allopurinol.”

Gout 2
Colchicine to prevent gout flares while starting treatment with allopurinol is “very cost effective,” according to findings.
Source: Adobe Stock.

To examine the cost effectiveness of using colchicine to prevent gout flares while starting allopurinol treatment, Robinson and colleagues performed a series of analyses from the point of view of the third-party payer in both the United States and Australia. Using TreeAge Software, they developed a twoarm decision tree with one arm starting allopurinol with no colchicine prophylaxis, and the other with colchicine.

Model inputs were collected from published literature where available. The researchers then performed a univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to confirm the robust nature of the modeling. The time frame used for the model was 6 months.

Philip C. Robinson, MBChB, PhD, FRACP
Philip C. Robinson

According to the researchers, the colchicine-prophylaxis arm demonstrated a cost of U.S. $1,276 and 0.49 quality-adjusted lifeyears, while the cost in the non-colchicine arm was U.S. $516 and 0.47 quality-adjusted lifeyears, with an incremental costeffectiveness ratio of U.S. $34,004 per quality-adjusted lifeyear gained.

In Australia, where colchicine is much less expensive, the colchicine arm cost AUS $208, compared with AUS $415 in the placebo arm. The researchers’ univariate and probability sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were robust to changes in input parameters.

Meanwhile, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that the probability of colchicine prophylaxis being the most cost-effective option was 93% in the United States and 100% in Australia.

“The key takeaways are that as well as being very clinically effective at preventing flares, [colchicine] is also very cost effective, and there should be few barriers to prescribe it,” Robinson said. “Along with other work we have done that shows that it is very safe, it should be used if at all possible when commencing allopurinol.”