December 29, 2017
2 min read
Save

Adalimumab biosimilar safe, effective in RA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with SB5, an adalimumab biosimilar, demonstrated a comparable response rate to those who received adalimumab, as judged by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria, according to findings published in Arthritis and Rheumatology.

“Several biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs targeted against tumor necrosis factor, such as adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab, have been developed and approved for use worldwide in patients with [RA] and have yielded very positive clinical outcomes,” Michael R. Weinblatt, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues wrote. “The use of [tumor necrosis factor] inhibitors in combination therapy for the treatment of RA is recommended by [EULAR] and [ACR].”

To determine the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of SB5, compared to adalimumab, the researchers conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial among patients with moderate-to-severe RA.

The full analysis included 542 participants assigned to either SB5 (n = 269) or adalimumab (n = 273). In addition, the per-protocol set included 476 patients: 239 who received SB5 and 237 who received adalimumab. Patients in both groups received a 40-mg dose, administered subcutaneously every other week. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the response rate as judged by the ACR20 improvement criteria at week 24 in the per-protocol set.

According to the researchers, the per-protocol group’s response rates were equivalent between those treated with SB5 and those who received adalimumab — 72.4% vs. 72.2%, respectively — with similar results reported in the full analysis set. The groups were also comparable across other endpoints, including the ACR 50% improvement criteria and ACR 70% response rates. The researchers’ subgroup analyses demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of SB5 was comparable to adalimumab, regardless of antidrug antibody status.

“The findings from this phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study showed equivalent efficacy between SB5 and the [adalimumab] reference product, as demonstrated by the ACR20 response rates at week 24 and other secondary efficacy end points at week 24,” Weinblatt and colleagues wrote. “SB5 was well-tolerated and possessed [pharmacokinetics], safety and immunogenicity profiles comparable to those of the reference [adalimumab].” – by Jason Laday

Disclosure: Weinblatt reports receiving consulting fees from and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Samsung, Crescendo Bioscience, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Pfizer and UCB, as well as research funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo Bioscience, Sanofi and UCB. See the full study for additional authors’ disclosures.