December 21, 2015
2 min read
Save

Vitamin D supplementation did not treat anemia in patients on dialysis

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Results from a clinical trial indicate that nutritional vitamin D supplements do not help in treating anemia in patients on hemodialysis, according to data published in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

Dana C. Miskulin , MD, MS, a nephrologist and associate professor at Tufts University School of Medicine, and colleagues conducted a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to investigate the effects of supplementation.

"Most patients on dialysis are treated with vitamin D receptor agonists (VDRAs), such as calcitrol, doxercalciferol or paracalcitol, for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism; however, if the hypothesized pleiotropic effects of vitamin D require local production, supplementation with VDRAs without its nutritional vitamin D precursor may not optimize clinical benefits, particularly as more than half of patients on hemodialysis are deficient in total serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D]," Miskulin and colleagues wrote. "The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder clinical guideline suggest supplementing with nutritional vitamin D to achieve 25(OH)D 30 ng/ml in patients on hemodialysis."

The researchers randomly assigned 276 patients with 25(OH)D levels of 30 ng/ml or less at baseline to treatment with ergocalciferol or placebo for 6 months.

Results showed that participants in the ergocalciferol group had a mean 25(OH)D baseline level of 16±5.9 ng/ml, which increased to 41±15.6 ng/ml at 3 months and 39.2±14.9 ng/ml at 6 months. Participants in the placebo group had a mean 25(OH)D baseline level of 16.9±6.4 ng/ml, which did not change with levels of 17.3±7 ng/ml at 3 months and 17.5±7.4 ng/ml at 6 months. Additionally, there was no change in weekly epoetin dose in the ergocalciferol group (geometric mean rate = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.02) or the placebo (geometric mean rate = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03) and no difference in the rate of change across the groups (P = .78).

There were no recorded changes in intact parathyroid hormone, phosphorus, serum calcium or C-reactive protein levels, phosphate binder or calcitriol dose or cinalcalet use in either treatment group.

Miskulin and colleagues also reported similar rates of call-cause, cardiovascular or infectious hospitalizations, falls and fractures between the treatment groups.

"Administration of ergocalciferol to 25(OH)D-deficient patients on hemodialysis increased 25(OH)D levels without significant increases in serum calcium or phosphorus; however, treatment had no effect on the primary outcome of epoetin dose," Miskulin and colleagues wrote. "While the study was not designed to examine all postulated actions that nutritional vitamin D might have, and thus, we cannot conclude that nutritional vitamin D is of no value in patients on dialysis, the study design was sufficient for us to conclude that there is no role for nutritional vitamin D in the management of anemia in patients on hemodialysis." by Chelsea Frajerman Pardes

Disclosures: All authors are either employed by Dialysis Clinic Inc. (DCI), receive salary support from DCI or are DCI medical directors. The authors report no additional financial disclosures.