Read more

June 26, 2024
1 min read
Save

3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones may yield excellent survivorship for revision TKA

Key takeaways:

  • Use of 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones was associated with excellent survivorship after revision knee arthroplasty.
  • Patients had low rates of aseptic loosening and re-revision at 5 years.

According to published results, use of 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones was associated with excellent survivorship and low rates of aseptic loosening and re-revision at 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Christopher N. Carender, MD, and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic analyzed outcomes from 740 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones (Triathlon total stabilized cones, Stryker) that were used in 533 revision TKAs from a tertiary care academic institution.

OT0624Carender_Graphic_01
Data were derived from Carender CN, et al. J Bone Joint Surg. 2024;doi:10.2106/JBJS.23.01196.

According to the study, the most common reasons for index revision included aseptic loosening (n = 199), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 183) and instability (n = 84).

At 5 years, Carender and colleagues found a 1% cumulative incidence of cone revision for aseptic loosening, a 6% cumulative incidence of cone revision or removal and a 14% cumulative incidence of any TKA re-revision.

Carender and colleagues noted the most common reasons for cone revision were PJI (n = 23), periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 3), arthrofibrosis (n = 3) and aseptic loosening of the femoral component and femoral cone (n = 3). In addition, they noted the most common reasons for any TKA re-revision were PJI (n = 38), persistent drainage (n = 6) and extensor mechanism disruption (n = 3).

“These data suggest that 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones achieve durable metaphyseal fixation at short-term follow-up after revision TKA,” Carender and colleagues wrote in the study.