October 29, 2016
1 min read
Save

High failure rate of modular exchange seen with constrained liner for revision THA

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

There was a higher failure rate, especially with a modular exchange, with the implantation of a focally constrained liner in revision total hip arthroplasty, according to study results.

Researchers identified 58 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a focally constrained liner. There were 19 hip reconstructions concurrently performed with an acetabular component revision and 39 hips had a well-fixed acetabular shell. The mean number of ipsilateral hip surgeries prior to revision THA was 4.2. Investigators analyzed clinical outcomes, redislocations and revisions at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years.

Investigators found the mean Harris Hip score was 74. Investigators noted at the final follow-up that 14 hips were revised and three hips needed reoperation. At a mean time of 12.2 months, there were 11 hips that had dislocated. Investigators found 31% of patients needed a modular exchange for instability dislocations.

According to researchers, the number of previous surgeries, implantation of a 22-mm femoral head, revision indication for instability and modular exchange with constrained implantation without the acetabular shell revision were all risk factors for redislocation. by Monica Jaramillo

 

Disclosures: Chalmers reports no relevant financial disclosures.  Please see the full study for a list of all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.