Issue: July 2016
May 25, 2016
1 min read
Save

Short knee X-rays may be inaccurate for assessment of coronal alignment after TKA

Issue: July 2016
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A recently published study showed use of the femorotibial angle on short films led to the misclassification of a significant proportion of patients as having varus, valgus or neutral coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty compared with the hip-knee-ankle angle.

Femorotibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle and the lateral distal femoral angle were measured in 262 patients with short and full-length standing radiographs before and after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A femorotibial angle between 2.4° and 7.2° on short knee X-rays or a hip-knee-ankle angle between -3° and 3° on full-length films were considered neutral coronal alignment, according to researchers.

Although results showed 13.9% of knees had a neutral femorotibial angle on short films preoperatively, full-length films showed 50% of those were in varus or valgus. Similarly, researchers found short films had 51.4% of knees listed as having a neutral femorotibial angle while full-length films showed 27.4% of those knees were in varus or valgus. According to results, discordant alignment classifications were identified in 13.9% of patients on preoperative imaging and in 33% of patients on postoperative imaging when comparisons were based on the short vs. full-length images. – by Casey Tingle

 

Disclosures: Park reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the full study for a complete list of all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.