January 16, 2015
1 min read
Save

Study: No significant difference between mobile, fixed-bearing TKA kinematics

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Although mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty had certain advantages over fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty, researchers found no significant differences between the kinematics of the two bearing types.

The researchers randomly assigned 40 knees of 37 patients with more than 120° knee flexion to mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or fixed-bearing TKA and evaluated knee kinematics using fluoroscopic imaging during step-up activity 1 year after surgery.

Results showed no statistically significant difference in the total extent of rotation for mobile- and fixed-bearing TKA, with a 1.9° tibial external rotation in the mobile-bearing group and 4.2° in the fixed-bearing group, according to the researchers.

Patients who underwent mobile-bearing TKA experienced a wider range of absolute axial rotation due to the axial rotation of the polyethylene insert. However, the polyethylene insert also moved as designed, especially with respect to the self-alignment feature.

Patients who received a fixed-bearing TKA had significantly more posterior medial and lateral condyles, according to study results. The researchers found only minor kinematic differences between the two TKAs. – by Casey Tingle

Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.