Read more

December 17, 2021
1 min read
Save

Three techniques have similar success rates to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

NEW ORLEANS — Pars plana vitrectomy has a similar success rate to scleral buckle or pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle in cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks, according to a presentation here.

“We aimed to compare the anatomic and visual outcomes between different surgical techniques ... for RRD with inferior tears,” Eunice You, MD, and colleagues wrote in a poster presentation at the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting.

The researchers conducted a retrospective study of 1,516 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) between 2014 and 2018; 504 eyes that had at least one inferior retinal break in the detached retina between 4 o’clock and 8 o’clock were included in the analysis.

The study’s primary outcome was the single-surgery success rate, which was defined by maintained retinal attachment at all follow-up points without the need for additional surgical intervention. The secondary outcome was final visual acuity.

Patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) had a success rate of 89.6%, patients who underwent scleral buckle (SB) had a success rate of 86.9%, and patients who underwent PPV with SB had a success rate of 89.3%.

Male sex (P = .027), macula-off status (P = .038) and baseline visual acuity (P < .001) were associated with worse final visual acuity.

“RRD with inferior retinal breaks had a similar single-surgery success rate across the three surgical techniques,” the study authors wrote. “This suggests that primary PPV [has] similar success rates without the potential complications of SB, although other studies suggest improved results with PPV-SB.”

Limitations included the retrospective and single-center nature of the study.