Read more

February 01, 2021
3 min read
Save

Pinhole pupilloplasty can correct astigmatism after manual small-incision cataract surgery

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Manual small-incision cataract surgery is an established method to perform cataract removal and is often considered as an alternative and a standby procedure to phacoemulsification in selected cases with associated ocular comorbidity.

An inadvertent complication during a phacoemulsification procedure often requires conversion to manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). Despite comprehensive preoperative assessment, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) can occur postoperatively in MSICS. The impact of residual astigmatism on visual acuity is immense and leads to patient dissatisfaction. All variations of MSICS techniques entail shaping of a self-sealing sclerocorneal tunnel that can directly influence SIA depending on its length, shape, regularity, distance from the limbus and extent into the clear cornea. The surgical procedure of pinhole pupilloplasty (PPP) has been described for correction of higher-order aberrations arising from the corneal surface. We hereby report the application of performing PPP to curtail the effect of high postoperative astigmatism following MSICS.

Amar Agarwal
Amar Agarwal
Priya Narang

The method of performing PPP has been described previously. In brief, single-pass four-throw pupilloplasty is performed to achieve a pinhole pupil of approximately 1.5 mm to 2 mm in diameter that is centered on the Purkinje 1 reflex emanating from the coaxial light of the surgical microscope.

Two cases presented after MSICS with a similar history of decrease in vision following an uncomplicated cataract surgery. Spectacle correction provided no relief as case 1 had residual refractive error of –5 D cylinder at 85° and case 2 had –4.5 D cylinder at 25°. Both cases underwent PPP, and there was a significant improvement in the preoperative and postoperative period for uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity for all viewing distances (distance, intermediate and near) under photopic and mesopic light conditions (Table 1). Clinical Trial Suite (M&S Technologies) was used to record data as it allows the luminance levels to be controlled and contrast levels to be adjusted as specified in the ANSI, ISO and consensus statement of the accommodative intraocular lens task force.

Visual Acuity table

Previous analysis following PPP revealed that patients demonstrate a defocus curve that ranges from +1.5 D to –2.5 D. As we had only two cases, defocus curve was not calculated, although similar results are expected for these cases as the patients were comfortable for all viewing distances. The pinhole effect provides a wide range of accommodation that facilitates better tolerance to residual refractive errors.

PPP following MSICS
Preoperative and postoperative image of PPP following MSICS. Image depicts a well-placed IOL following a small-incision cataract surgery. White arrows indicate the irregular extension into clear cornea that led to high astigmatism.

Source: Priya Narang, MS, and Amar Agarwal, MS, FRCS, FRCOphth

To summarize, satisfactory outcomes are reported after performing PPP in post-MSICS to tackle high astigmatism. Although there are multiple methods to correct astigmatism in post-cataract patients, PPP can be considered as a viable option.