Nearly 1 in 5 wet AMD patients lost to follow-up after anti-VEGF injections
Study results showed a high rate of loss to follow-up in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-VEGF injections in the U.S., with nearly 1 in 5 patients lost to follow-up.
“Because retina clinics are often overwhelmed by patients requiring intravitreal injections, it’s easy to overlook patients who do not regularly follow-up and eventually are lost to follow-up,” Rahul N. Khurana, MD, vitreoretinal surgeon with of Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group Inc., said during his presentation at the virtual American Society of Retina Specialists meeting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3bdd/d3bddc3a3954bfe6d2db946b7e7a0885b08b945a" alt=""
“The Wills Eye group looked at this problem and found that when they defined loss to follow up as no visit greater than 12 months after an intravitreal injection, [there was] a very high rate in neovascular AMD reaching nearly 22% among the 9,000 patients studied in a large private practice with 13 clinical sites,” Khurana said. “We wanted to see if this experience at Wills was representative of a national group.”
In a retrospective cohort analysis involving 292,080 patients with neovascular AMD, Khurana and colleagues examined the incidence of loss to follow up in patients treated with anti-VEGF injections in the U.S. and identified associated risk factors. The study included patients diagnosed with AMD from 2013 to 2015 and treated with anti-VEGF therapy between 2013 and 2018. The investigators performed multivariable logistic regression analysis involving baseline demographic and clinical conditions.
Overall, 20.14% of patients with neovascular AMD were lost to follow-up, 78.62% of patients had a follow-up within 12 months and 1.24% of patients who were lost to follow-up did have later follow-up, according to the presentation.
“There’s a high rate of loss to follow-up in patients with neovascular AMD in the United States, with nearly 1 in 5 patients lost to follow-up,” Khurana said. “Risk factors include increasing age, male sex, unreported ethnicity, unilateral involvement, private insurance, government/military insurance had a higher rate of being loss to follow-up.”
The results showed that compared with patients aged 70 years and younger, the risk for loss to follow-up were greater among patients:
- aged 76-80 years (OR = 1.252; 95% CI, 1.302-1.302);
- aged 81-85 years (OR = 1.252; 95% CI, 1.203-1.302);
- aged 86-90 years (OR = 1.436; 95% CI, 1.381-1.483); and
- aged older than 90 years (OR = 1.681; 95% CI, 1.613-1.751).
The risk for loss to follow-up was lower for women (OR = 0.897; 95% CI, 0.879-0.915) than men, and the risk among Hispanic patients (OR = 1.167; 95% CI, 1.105-1.234) and those of unreported race (OR = 3.025; 95% CI, 2.943-3.109) were greater than the risk among white patients.
Further, risk for loss to follow-up in patients with baseline visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/200 (OR = 1.214; 95% CI, 1.187-1.242) were greater than in patients with baseline visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and the risk for loss to follow-up with bilateral involvement (OR = 0.145; 95% CI, 0.142-0.149) were less than unilateral involvement, according to the findings.
“Improving adherence is key to optimizing long-term outcomes. It really illustrates the importance in patients in maintaining and developing new strategies to have patients follow-up with care,” Khurana said. “It will require more patient-centered strategies to motivate patients to continue their care and ultimately to optimize their outcomes and management of AMD.”