September 08, 2017
1 min read
Save

PUBLICATION EXCLUSIVE: IRIS Registry offers many benefits for US ophthalmologists

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Big data is defined as extremely large data sets that may be analyzed computationally to reveal patterns, trends and associations, especially relating to human behavior and interactions. An extraordinary amount of human and financial capital is being invested toward collecting and analyzing big data. Potential contributions to medicine include enhancing the diagnosis and management of disease; targeting personalized medicine, in which patient profiles can be utilized to select ideal treatments, which today is especially useful in oncology; improving practice management; determining group and individual buying patterns to enhance marketing; and of course, allowing our federal and state government to screen for fraud and abuse in provider care and billing patterns.

In the genetic area, Google’s DNAstack and the 23andMe DNA database each have big data on DNA predictors in health care on more than 1 million people. To me, the best positive example of big data in ophthalmology is the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry. The best negative example for us physicians is big data mining by payers to screen for potential targets for billing errors and, in the case of some insurers, looking for more expensive providers and expelling them from provider panels. Depending on your perspective, both could be considered positive, but from my perspective, there is much opportunity for abuse in the latter. I am going to focus on the positive.

The success of the IRIS Registry is nothing short of remarkable. Conceptualized in 2012 and launched about 2 years later, the IRIS Registry has already attracted more than 12,000 of the just more than 18,000 American ophthalmologists as participants, and the number continues to grow. In a commentary 2 years ago, I encouraged all U.S. ophthalmologists to enroll, and my advice remains the same. My partners and I at Minnesota Eye Consultants are participants. Participation in the IRIS Registry is free — that’s right, free — and the benefits are many and meaningful. All U.S. ophthalmologists should thank the AAO leadership for making this wonderful tool available.

  • Click here to read the full publication exclusive, Lindstrom's Perspective, published in Ocular Surgery News U.S. Edition, September 10, 2017.