This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
Success of nasolacrimal probing not affected by age or surgeon experience
The success rate of nasolacrimal probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction was 77.3% after first probing and more than 90% after second probing, according to a study.
The retrospective case series included 88 eyes of 62 patients between the ages of 1 month and 138 months at Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal. Successful nasolacrimal probing was defined as effective lacrimal irrigation intraoperatively and resolution of epiphora at 1 month.
After first probing, 77.3% of the procedures were declared a success, and there were no statistically significant differences in the success rate regarding age, gender, laterality or experience of the surgeon. Surgical success decreased in children older than 4 years to 57%, but the difference between children younger than 4 years and older than 4 years was not statistically significant.
After second probing, the success rate increased to 90.9%. Persistent nasolacrimal obstruction occurred in about 30% of patients, with adenoid hypertrophy requiring surgical correction. – by Robert Linnehan
Disclosure: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.
Perspective
Back to Top
Roberto Warman, MD
In a recent retrospective review of nasolacrimal duct probing under general anesthesia by Joao Beato and colleagues, in the Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, it was reported that the success rate was not related to age, gender, laterality or the surgeon’s experience for a patient up to 4 years old. The study also recommended probing alone until 4 years old, as the success rate was 77% on first probing and up to 90% on second probing. It has traditionally been felt that after 3 years of age the success rate decreases, and it is preferable to perform prior to this time. It is welcome news that obtaining good results for patients 4 years of age and older is possible in instances where it could not be done sooner. However, it does not address other issues. If probing is done in the office by 9 months of age then the success rate is as high. Also, avoiding general anesthesia is worthwhile particularly with recent data of repeated anesthesia issues on infants (I admit usually longer anesthesia procedures). Second, the addition of nasolacrimal intubation when a patient is under general anesthesia will decrease the failure rate and will decrease the need for a second anesthesia, particularly the older a child is. Those issues should be taken into account when deciding best time for correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Roberto Warman, MD
OSN Pediatrics/Strabismus Board Member
Disclosures: Warman reports no relevant financial disclosures.
Published by: