April 24, 2017
2 min read
Save

Study compares outcomes of pediatric primary and secondary IOL implantation

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Pediatric patients who underwent secondary IOL implantation for pediatric cataract experienced generally worse best corrected visual acuity and a higher risk for developing strabismus than patients who underwent primary IOL implantation, according to a study.

Perspective from M. Edward Wilson, MD

The study included pediatric patients who had undergone cataract surgery between 1999 and 2014. Researchers retrospectively reviewed 220 eyes of 148 patients with a mean age of 6.84 ± 3.45 years at the time of cataract extraction and primary posterior chamber IOL implantation. Patients had a mean age of 8.92 ± 5.12 years at the time of secondary IOL implantation.

According to the study, 180 eyes underwent primary posterior chamber IOL implantation and 40 eyes underwent secondary implantation. At final follow-up, the mean BCVA in the primary group was 0.44 ± 0.33 compared with 0.28 ± .032 in the secondary group (P = .013). Strabismus was diagnosed in 23.73% of patients in the primary group and 30% of patients in the secondary group; the difference was not statistically significant.

“Logistic regression analysis of possible risk factors for the development of strabismus revealed a statistically significant negative relationship between visual acuity and strabismus (P = .048), with lower visual acuity causing more strabismus. There was a significant positive relationship between follow-up periods and strabismus (P = .008), with the development of strabismus increasing as the follow-up period increased,” the researchers wrote. – by Robert Linnehan

Disclosure: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.