Small-gauge vitrectomy associated with likelihood of successful recurrent macular hole closure
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — It is unclear if the use of small-gauge vitrectomy to treat macular holes results in less incidence of recurrent macular holes, but the procedure has a high likelihood of success in treating recurrent macular holes, according to a speaker here.
“There is a high likelihood of successful closure with reoperation, without necessarily doing [internal limiting membrane] flaps and other things, if the holes are regular sized,” Tarek S. Hassan, MD, of the United States, said at the inaugural Retina World Congress.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70b96/70b96c40ee890cf6e2996c2a63330e2e303947a9" alt="Tarek S. Hassan"
Tarek S. Hassan
While most macular holes do close after surgery, historically about 4.8% to 9.2% reopen. Small-gauge vitrectomy theoretically has several advantages over traditional methods because it is less invasive, results in less inflammation and may offer less postoperative cystoid macular edema, Hassan said.
In a current retrospective series being conducted by Hassan and colleagues, recurrent macular holes in eyes treated entirely with small-gauge vitrectomy techniques were evaluated. In the series, 392 eyes underwent small-gauge vitrectomy, and all had successful closure of full-thickness macular holes. However, 13 eyes had a reopening of the macular
hole at least 1 month postoperative, Hassan said. All 13 eyes underwent another small-gauge vitrectomy and remained closed after 1 month. However, three eyes had a second reopening, with a range of 5 to 49 months postoperative. One patient chose another vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane peeling and the macular hole was again closed.
At the most recent follow-up, all 11 eyes that underwent surgery still had closed macular holes and experienced a mean visual acuity improvement from 20/148 to 20/89, Hassan said.
However, of the 13 eyes that had reopened macular holes, 77% developed a full-thickness macular hole in the other eye, he said.
“There was something clearly abnormal about the vitreomacular interface with the ILM in these patients,” he said. – by Robert Linnehan
Reference:
Hassan TS. Recurrent macular hole. Presented at: Retina World Congress; Feb. 23-26, 2017; Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
Disclosure: Hassan reports no relevant financial disclosures.