February 29, 2016
1 min read
Save

PRK combined with cross-linking may outperform cross-linking alone for treatment of keratoconus

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Topography-guided PRK followed by corneal collagen cross-linking yielded a significantly greater improvement in vision than cross-linking alone in eyes with progressive keratoconus, a study found.

Both procedures yielded similarly stable postoperative outcomes.

The prospective study included 60 eyes of 48 patients. Thirty eyes underwent combined topography-guided PRK followed by cross-linking, and 30 eyes underwent cross-linking alone. Mean follow-up was 39 months.

Depth of cross-linking treatment was 269.8 µm in the cross-linking only group and 299.7 µm in the combined group; the difference was statistically significant (P < .001).

At final follow-up, mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity improved by 9.1 letters in the cross-linking only group and 26.9 letters in the combined group. The between-group difference was statistically significant (P = .004).

Mean logMAR corrected distance visual acuity improved by 4.7 letters in the cross-linking only group and 8.6 letters in the combined group. The between-group difference was significant (P = .034).

Sixty-three percent of patients in the combined treatment group and 27% in the cross-linking only group gained two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity; the difference was statistically significant (P = .009).

The difference between preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent refraction and defocus equivalent refraction was significant in the combined treatment group (both P < .0001) but not in the cross-linking only group.

Also at final follow-up, steep and flat keratometry readings were significantly flatter in the combined treatment group than in the cross-linking only group.

Endothelial cell density was similar in both groups. – by Matt Hasson

Disclosure: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.