February 01, 2016
2 min read
Save

Sub-Tenon’s cannula may be similar to sharp retrobulbar needle for vitreoretinal surgery anesthesia

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The use of a sub-Tenon’s cannula may be comparable to a sharp retrobulbar needle for local operative anesthesia before vitreoretinal surgeries, according to a study.

Perspective from Daniel F. Kiernan, MD

The retrospective comparative study reviewed 1,711 vitreoretinal surgeries that received local anesthesia, in which 940 cases were performed with a blunt sub-Tenon’s cannula and 771 cases were performed with a sharp retrobulbar needle. In total, 99% of cases in each surgical group were completed.

There was a surgeon preference for a sharp retrobulbar needle over a blunt sub-Tenon’s cannula in eyes that had a scleral buckle present and in eyes undergoing scleral buckle placement.

“We surmise this bias reflects surgeons’ concerns for conjunctival scarring with resultant difficulty in passing the blunt cannula into the sub-Tenon’s space and concern for postoperative scleral buckle exposure at the conjunctival incision needed to pass the blunt cannula,” the study authors said.

Conversion from local anesthesia to general endotracheal anesthesia was required in nine procedures using a sub-Tenon’s cannula and 12 procedures using a retrobulbar needle.

There were no vision-threatening complications in either group.

“Since we observed no blinding complications of globe perforation, retrobulbar hemorrhage or brain stem anesthesia in either group during our study, we cannot claim one technique is safer than another,” the authors said. – by Kristie L. Kahl

Disclosure: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.