August 06, 2015
1 min read
Save

Heparin-coated IOL does not affect development of posterior capsule opacification

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A hydrophobic acrylic IOL with heparin coating reduced flare 1 day postoperatively but did not reduce posterior capsule opacification more than an uncoated version of the same lens at 1 year, a study found.

The prospective study included 102 eyes of 51 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and were randomized to receive an EC-1YH PAL heparin-coated hydrophobic IOL (Aaren Scientific) in one eye and an uncoated EC-1Y PAL IOL (Aaren) in the fellow eye.

Investigators used the Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) system to grade the density of opacification on a scale of 0 (no opacification) to 4 (severe opacification).

Patients underwent objective aqueous flare measurement and determination of manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity at 1 day and 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Investigators determined straylight values at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

The mean EPCO score was 0.50 in the coated IOL group and 0.45 in the uncoated IOL group at 1 year postoperatively; the between-group difference was insignificant.

Both groups had similar straylight measurements, distance visual acuities and contrast sensitivity values.

Flare was significantly reduced at 1 day in the coated IOL group. However, mean flare values were 13.6% higher than preoperative baseline flare values in the coated IOL group and 12% higher in the uncoated IOL group and approached baseline flare values at 1 year postoperatively.

There was a correlation between uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity in both groups, but the correlation was not significant. – by Matt Hasson

Disclosure: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.