November 11, 2014
2 min read
Save

Patient satisfaction with multifocal IOLs linked to personality traits

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Personality traits influenced perception of visual disturbances and patient satisfaction after implantation of multifocal IOLs, according to a study.

Perspective from Scott M. MacRae, MD

The study included 183 patients who underwent bilateral multifocal IOL implantation.

A questionnaire was used preoperatively to evaluate personality traits such as conscientiousness, orderli­ness, dutifulness, achievement striving, deliberation, self-discipline and competence.

Another questionnaire was administered at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively to gauge overall satisfaction, spectacle dependence, visual function and ease of performing daily functions.

Uncorrected and corrected near and distance visual acuities were assessed preoperatively and 3 months and 6 months postoperatively.

Halos were described as slight by 18.4% of patients, moderate by 25% and severe by 12.8% at 3 months. No patients reported severe glare.

Photic phenomena did not trouble 75.4% of patients; 24.6% were troubled, but patients were able to toler­ate those phenomena.

Additionally, at 3 months, 82.2% of patients said they would choose a multifocal IOL again, 3.7% would not and 14.1% were undecided; the percentages were nearly identical at 6 months.

Twenty-three patients were dissatisfied with postoperative outcomes. Eleven of those 23 patients were spectacle-free, and seven had near and distance visual acuity exceeding 0.1 logMAR and less than 1 D of astigmatism.

“These seven patients lay outside the normal range for at least two or more of the compulsive checking, orderliness, competence and dutifulness personality traits. No specific postoperative parameter could explain their dissatisfaction,” the authors said.

Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.