Single IOL may be option in some small, highly hyperopic eyes
LONDON – One thicker lens may be a better option than two thinner IOLs in small, highly hyperopic eyes, a speaker here said.
“When dealing with small eyes, a very common question that arises is what is optically better – a single, thicker, higher-powered lens or to split the power into two lower-powered thinner lenses?” Bruno C. Trindade, MD, said at the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Congress here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a79/63a79c1e8590d3caddad9cd38e756e143e77bd99" alt="Bruno Trindade"
Bruno C. Trindade
Using simulation software, Trindade and colleagues modeled 65 different eye models needing a 60 D lens to achieve emmetropia using corneal curvatures varied between 42 D and 50 D and axial lengths between 15.23 mm and 16.90 mm, but all with constant effective lens position.
Using a 3 mm pupil size, Trindade and colleagues compared spherical and aspheric performance of a single 60 D lens with two piggyback models: one with matching 30 D lenses and the other with a 20 D lens in front and a 40 D lens in back.
In spherical lenses, the single lens had the worst performance, Trindade said; however, considering aspheric lenses, the single lens performed statistically significantly better than either of the other two lens strategies.
“One IOL is optically better to be used in a highly hyperopic nanophthalmic eye if […] this IOL is aspheric and this IOL is well-centered,” Trindade said.
Disclosure: Trindade has no relevant financial interests.