September 01, 2013
1 min read
Save

A commentary on health care: The perfect storm

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

To the Editor:

It may surprise the public to learn that the majority of doctors oppose Obamacare. These physicians are particularly in opposition to the section of the Affordable Care Act that has created the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a 15-person committee of non-physicians appointed by the president. In fact, even the American Medical Association, which was acquiescent in the passage of Obamacare before it became law, supported the failed House of Representatives’ effort to rescind this portion of the law. Unfortunately, this effort was defeated in the Senate. However, by now, everyone with common sense realizes that this section of Obamacare will forever threaten the sacred doctor-patient relationship.

Malcolm R. Ing, MD

Malcolm R. Ing

In addition, the failure to address steeply rising drug and technology costs and the absence of tort reform to decrease necessity to practice defensive medicine were important omissions in Obamacare. Taking personal responsibility by maintaining a healthy lifestyle and health savings account is not going to be encouraged by government control of medical insurance and payments to hospitals and physicians.

To make matters worse, Medicare now requires physicians to utilize electronic medical records for their patients, with an initial cost of at least $35,000, to avoid paying a financial penalty. Ironically, just when the country will need more physicians to provide medical and surgical care, especially to the elderly, the government plans to add to the costs of providing that care. All this is taking place while Congress is failing to address the chronic problem of the sustainable growth rate and Medicare underpayment to physicians, which limits the number of elderly patients that doctors can accept in their practices. It should be no shock to learn that, when surveyed, many physicians consider the increased bureaucracy as motivation to retire early, which will aggravate the already recognized doctor shortage. By 2014, an additional half billion dollars will be removed from Medicare funds that are barely keeping the program afloat as it is.

Lastly, the medical insurance requirement for physicians to utilize ICD-10, the more complicated insurance coding, by 2014 necessitates more cost and personnel to maintain medical practice.

Anyone who has truly studied all these factors will realize that they are the elements of an impending perfect storm for medical care in this country.

Malcolm R. Ing, MD
Honolulu