April 08, 2013
2 min read
Save

FDA Ophthalmic Devices Panel calls Trulign toric accommodating IOL safe, effective

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

GAITHERSBURG, Md. — The Ophthalmic Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration voted positively on the Trulign toric accommodating posterior chamber IOL.

Perspective from Mark Packer, MD

The Trulign IOL is a toric model of Bausch + Lomb’s Crystalens models AT-50SE and AT-52SE.

To the question, is there reasonable assurance that the Trulign toric is safe for use in patients who meet the criteria specified in the proposed indication, there were 10 yes votes, zero no votes and two abstentions.

On the question of whether there is a reasonable assurance that the Trulign toric is effective for use in patients who meet the criteria specified in the proposed indication, there were 10 yes votes, one no vote and one abstention.

Asked if the benefits of the Trulign for use in patients who meet the criteria specified in the proposed indication outweigh the risks for use in patients who meet the criteria specified in the proposed indication, there were 10 yes votes, one no vote and one abstention.

“We are pleased and encouraged by the outcome of the April 8 FDA Ophthalmic Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee,” Elizabeth Murphy, Bausch + Lomb spokesperson, told Ocular Surgery News. “While we recognize that the FDA is not obligated to follow the recommendation of the panel, we plan to work diligently with the agency to enable them to complete their review and issue an approval of our Trulign toric accommodating IOL application.”

During panel discussions, a vocal minority of members expressed a strong opinion that post-market studies should be performed to more precisely determine the amount of accommodation and that the FDA should consider possible label changes of the lens according to a more stringent definition of accommodation.

The pivotal study was a prospective, multicenter, single-masked, partially randomized, partially controlled, monocular implantation with follow-up based on establishment of rotational stability up to 1 year postoperatively.

Panel members raised issues with the overall study design, outcome measurements and high number of protocol deviations. The FDA analysis of the trial found 28 major deviations and 373 minor deviations. Of the major deviations, 11 failed to meet enrollment criteria, seven were noncompliant with the surgical protocol, and 10 involved implantation of the AT-52T and AT-52SE IOLs instead of the AT-50T and AT-50SE models.